首页> 外文期刊>Cerebrovascular diseases >Interdisciplinary Treatment of Intracranial Infectious Aneurysms
【24h】

Interdisciplinary Treatment of Intracranial Infectious Aneurysms

机译:颅内感染性动脉瘤的跨学科治疗

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: Intracranial infectious aneurysms (IIAs) are a rare clinical entity without a definitive treatment guideline. In this study, we evaluate the treatment options of these lesions based on our own clinical experience and review the current knowledge of therapy as portrayed in the literature. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of all patients with an IIA and performed a systematic review of the literature using the MEDLINE database. We undertook a comprehensive literature search using the OVID gateway of the MEDLINE database (1950-October 2015) using the following keywords (in combination): 'infectious', 'mycotic', 'cerebral aneurysm', 'intracranial aneurysm'. 1,721 potentially relevant abstracts were identified and 63 studies were selected for full review. The studies were analysed regarding ruptured versus unruptured aneurysms, aneurysm localization and treatment, as well as clinical and radiological outcome. Results: Our institutional series consisted of 6 patients (median age 57 [32-76]) treated between 2011 and 2015. All patients presented with ruptured IIAs located on the middle cerebral artery (MCA, 5 patients) and anterior cerebral artery (ACA, 1 patient). Five patients were treated by clipping and resecting the aneurysm, 1 patient underwent coiling. All patients received antibiotic therapy and 1 patient died. We further identified 814 patients (median age 35.5 [0-81]) in 63 studies. Locations of the aneurysms were mentioned in 55 studies. The most frequent locations of the aneurysms were: MCA (63.5%), posterior cerebral artery (14%), ACA (9.0%) and others (13.5%). Treatment for IIAs was described in 62 studies: antibiotic treatment (56.1%), a combination of antibiotics and surgery (20.9%) or antibiotics and endovascular treatment (23.0%). Outcome was mentioned in 82.4% of the patients with a mortality rate of 16.8%. An evaluation of treatment outcome was limited due to the heterogeneity of patients in the published case series. Conclusion: Antibiotic therapy of patients with IIA is mandatory. However, due to the complexity of the disease and its accompanying comorbidities, a general treatment algorithm could not be defined. Analogous to non-mycotic aneurysms, further treatment decisions require an interdisciplinary approach involving neurosurgeons, interventionists and infectious disease specialists. (C) 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel
机译:目的:颅内感染性动脉瘤(IIA)是一种罕见的临床实体,没有明确的治疗指南。在这项研究中,我们根据自己的临床经验评估这些病变的治疗方案,并回顾文献中描述的当前治疗知识。方法:我们对所有IIA患者进行了单中心回顾性分析,并使用MEDLINE数据库对文献进行了系统的综述。我们使用MEDLINE数据库(1950年10月至2015年10月)的OVID网关,使用以下关键字(结合使用)进行了全面的文献搜索:“感染性”,“真菌性”,“脑动脉瘤”,“颅内动脉瘤”。确定了1,721篇可能相关的摘要,并选择了63篇研究进行全面审查。分析了有关破裂性动脉瘤与未破裂性动脉瘤,动脉瘤的定位和治疗以及临床和放射学结果的研究。结果:我们的机构研究系列包括2011年至2015年期间接受治疗的6例患者(中位年龄为57 [32-76]岁)。所有患者均位于大脑中动脉(MCA,5例)和前脑动脉(ACA, 1位患者)。 5例患者通过剪除和切除动脉瘤进行治疗,其中1例患者进行了盘绕。所有患者均接受抗生素治疗,其中1例死亡。我们在63项研究中进一步确定了814例患者(中位年龄35.5 [0-81])。 55项研究提到了动脉瘤的位置。动脉瘤最常见的位置是:MCA(63.5%),脑后动脉(14%),ACA(9.0%)和其他(13.5%)。 IIA的治疗在62项研究中进行了描述:抗生素治疗(56.1%),抗生素与手术相结合(20.9%)或抗生素加血管内治疗(23.0%)。在82.4%的患者中提到结果,死亡率为16.8%。由于已发表病例系列中患者的异质性,对治疗结局的评估受到限制。结论:IIA患者必须接受抗生素治疗。但是,由于该疾病的复杂性及其伴随的合并症,无法定义一般的治疗算法。与非霉菌性动脉瘤相似,进一步的治疗决策需要神经外科医师,干预专家和传染病专家的跨学科研究。 (C)2016 S.Karger AG,巴塞尔

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号