...
首页> 外文期刊>Cardiovascular journal of Africa. >South Africa's poor warfarin control raises questions of benefit above other anticoagulant therapies in atrial fibrillation.
【24h】

South Africa's poor warfarin control raises questions of benefit above other anticoagulant therapies in atrial fibrillation.

机译:南非对华法林的控制不佳引起了人们对房颤优于其他抗凝疗法的益处的问题。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

South African patients entered into the ACTIVE-W trial were outside the ideal INR targets of 2-3 for 60% of the time while on warfarin therapy. This poor control of warfarin reduces benefit and raises the question as to whether other newer anticoagulant therapies should be used for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. New management strategies are also needed to improve warfarin control. Poor control of warfarin was a very significant feature of the South African-entered patients and, in fact, South Africa as a country was at the bottom of the log of achieved time in therapeutic range (TTR) (See Table 1, amended from reference 1). Furthermore, no South African patients were in the upper quartiles of TTR control.
机译:在接受华法林治疗的60%的时间内,参加ACTIVE-W试验的南非患者在INR理想目标值2-3之外。华法林的这种不良控制降低了获益,并引发了关于是否应在心房纤颤中使用其他较新的抗凝疗法来预防中风的问题。还需要新的管理策略来改善华法林的控制。对华法林的不良控制是南非患者的一个非常重要的特征,事实上,南非作为一个国家处于治疗时间(TTR)的实现时间对数的底部(请参阅表1,从参考文献中修改) 1)。此外,没有南非患者处于TTR对照的上四分位。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号