首页> 外文期刊>Cerebrovascular diseases >Performance of the ABCD and ABCD2 scores in TIA patients with carotid stenosis and atrial fibrillation.
【24h】

Performance of the ABCD and ABCD2 scores in TIA patients with carotid stenosis and atrial fibrillation.

机译:TIA合并颈动脉狭窄和心房颤动的患者的ABCD和ABCD2评分表现。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that scores for risk stratification of TIA patients might not identify patients with carotid stenosis or atrial fibrillation (AF) and that this might undermine the usefulness of such scores. METHODS: In patients with TIA in the Oxford Vascular Study, we studied the associations between ABCD and ABCD2 scores, the presence of > or =50% ipsilateral carotid stenosis or AF, and the risk of stroke at 7 days. RESULTS: Among 285 TIA patients (from 559 referrals of possible TIA), 69 (24.2%) had either > or =50% carotid stenosis (n = 29) or AF (n = 42), or both (n = 2). Although the ABCD and ABCD2 scores were highly predictive of stroke at 7 days (p < 0.0001), there was no clear relationship between either score and the prevalence of > or =50% carotid stenosis or AF. However, the scores did predict the 7-day stroke risk in patients with these pathologies: ABCD score (trend-p = 0.05); ABCD2 (trend-p = 0.03). Five of the 6 patients with AF or symptomatic stenosis who had a stroke within 7 days of their TIA had an ABCD score of > or =5 and all 6 had an ABCD2 score of > or 4. CONCLUSIONS: The ABCD and ABCD2 risk scores appear to identify patients with > or =50% carotid stenosis or AF who are at high risk of stroke. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution due to the small number of outcomes among these subgroups, and further validations are necessary.
机译:背景:已经提出,TIA患者的风险分层评分可能无法识别出患有颈动脉狭窄或心房颤动(AF)的患者,这可能会破坏此类评分的实用性。方法:在牛津血管研究的TIA患者中,我们研究了ABCD和ABCD2评分,同侧颈动脉狭窄或AF≥50%的存在以及7天时发生中风的风险之间的关系。结果:在285名TIA患者(从559个可能的TIA转诊中)中,有69名(24.2%)患有或超过50%的颈动脉狭窄(n = 29)或AF(n = 42),或两者(n = 2)。尽管ABCD和ABCD2评分在7天时可高度预测中风(p <0.0001),但评分与≥50%的颈动脉狭窄或AF的患病率之间没有明确的关系。但是,这些评分确实可以预测具有以下病理状况的患者的7天卒中风险:ABCD评分(趋势p = 0.05); ABCD2(趋势p = 0.03)。在TIA的7天之内发生中风的6例AF或症状性狭窄患者中,有5例的ABCD评分>或= 5,而全部6例的ABCD2评分或4。结论:出现ABCD和ABCD2风险评分识别出中风风险高的≥50%或≥50%的颈动脉狭窄或房颤患者。但是,由于这些亚组中结局较少,因此应谨慎解释这些发现,因此有必要进行进一步的验证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号