首页> 外文期刊>European neurology >Correlation between abcd, abcd2 scores and craniocervical artery stenosis in patients with transient ischemic attack
【24h】

Correlation between abcd, abcd2 scores and craniocervical artery stenosis in patients with transient ischemic attack

机译:短暂性脑缺血发作患者abcd,abcd2评分与颅颈动脉狭窄的相关性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and Purpose: Craniocervical artery stenosis is an important etiology for transient ischemic attack (TIA). We hypothesized ABCD and ABCD2 scores can predict craniocervical artery stenosis in patients with TIA. Methods: ABCD and ABCD2 scores were calculated in a total of 479 consecutive first-ever TIA patients in Nanjing Stroke Registry Program and compared with angiographic imaging derived from MRI or invasive catheter-based angiography. Results: Overall craniocervical artery (O-CA) stenosis was found in 197 (41.1%) patients. Extracranial craniocervical artery (E-CA) and intracranial craniocervical artery (I-CA) stenosis was found in 101 (21.1%) and 110 (23%) cases, respectively. ABCD and ABCD2 scores with similar accuracy for O-CA (AUC ABCD 0.71, AUCABCD2 0.70), E-CA (AUCABCD 0.72, AUCABCD2 0.72) and I-CA stenosis (AUCABCD 0.62, AUC ABCD2 0.62) were both independent predictors for various categories of artery stenosis after being adjusted for non-ABCD2 parameters. The cut-off points were equally 4 in both predicting rules. For ABCD, sensitivity was 57.4, 65.3 and 52.7% and specificity 77.0, 70.4 and 67.5% for O-CA/E-CA/I-CA, respectively. For ABCD2, sensitivity was 61.9, 69.3 and 58.2% and specificity 72.3, 65.6 and 63.1%. Conclusions: In patients with TIA, despite an association between ABCD and ABCD2 scores and underlying craniocervical artery stenosis, the clinical utility was limited by unsatisfactory sensitivity and specificity.
机译:背景与目的:颅颈动脉狭窄是短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)的重要病因。我们假设ABCD和ABCD2评分可以预测TIA患者的颅颈动脉狭窄。方法:在南京卒中注册计划中,对总共479位连续的首次TIA患者进行ABCD和ABCD2评分计算,并将其与MRI或基于导管的血管造影成像相比较。结果:197例(41.1%)患者发现总体颅颈动脉(O-CA)狭窄。颅外颅颈动脉狭窄(E-CA)和颅内颅颈动脉狭窄(I-CA)分别发现101例(21.1%)和110例(23%)。 O-CA(AUC ABCD 0.71,AUCABCD2 0.70),E-CA(AUCABCD 0.72,AUCABCD2 0.72)和I-CA狭窄(AUCABCD 0.62,AUC ABCD2 0.62)的ABCD和ABCD2评分具有相似的准确性,都是各个类别的独立预测因子调整非ABCD2参数后的动脉狭窄情况。在两个预测规则中,临界点均等于4。对于ABCD,O-CA / E-CA / I-CA的敏感性分别为57.4、65.3和52.7%,特异性为77.0、70.4和67.5%。对于ABCD2,敏感性为61.9%,69.3%和58.2%,特异性为72.3%,65.6%和63.1%。结论:在TIA患者中,尽管ABCD和ABCD2评分与潜在的颅颈动脉狭窄之间存在关联,但其临床应用受到敏感性和特异性不佳的限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号