首页> 外文期刊>Science in context >Citizen, academic, expert, or international worker? Juggling with identities at UNESCO's social science department, 1946-1955
【24h】

Citizen, academic, expert, or international worker? Juggling with identities at UNESCO's social science department, 1946-1955

机译:公民,学者,专家还是国际工作者? 1946-1955年,在联合国教科文组织的社会科学系摆弄身份

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Argument This paper explores the links between the competing scientific, disciplinary, and institutional identifications of social scientists working for international organizations and the nature of the work produced in these establishments. By examining the case of UNESCO's Social Science Department from 1946 to 1955, the paper shows how the initial lack of organizational identification diminished the efficiency and productivity of the Department and slowed down the creation of an international system for research in the social sciences. It then examines how the elaboration of such identification resulted from a period of trial and error during which several national, academic, and scientific models were explored. The paper concludes that only the discourse of moral sensitivity kept the Department together at a time when disillusions regarding internationalism, the destabilization of the meaning of nation, and suspicion towards some Western disciplines rendered unacceptable the universalization of a single international social scientific identification.
机译:论点本文探讨了为国际组织工作的社会科学家相互竞争的科学,学科和机构标识与这些机构所开展工作的性质之间的联系。通过研究1946年至1955年联合国教科文组织社会科学系的案例,该论文显示出最初缺乏组织认同感如何降低了该系的效率和生产力,并减缓了社会科学国际研究体系的建立。然后,它研究了这种鉴定的详细说明是如何经过一段反复试验的结果而得出的,在这段反复试验中,探索了几种国家,学术和科学模型。该论文的结论是,在对国际主义的幻想破灭,国家含义的不稳定以及对某些西方学科的怀疑使单一国际社会科学认同的普遍接受成为无法接受的时候,只有道德敏感性的论述才使该部团结在一起。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号