首页> 外文期刊>Scientia Agricola >Comparison of beat cloth and entomological net methods for determining faunistic indices of soybean in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
【24h】

Comparison of beat cloth and entomological net methods for determining faunistic indices of soybean in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

机译:确定巴西里奥格兰德州大豆拍打指数的拍子布和昆虫网方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Estimates of diversity indices provide information on distribution, richness and abundance of species within a community. The aim of the current study was to estimate faunistic indices (richness, constancy, dominance and abundance) of the species collected by beat cloth and entomological net sampling methods in different soybean crops and to determine the sample size necessary to estimate faunistic indices. Fauna density from 100 soybeans crops located in nine municipalities in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, were evaluated. Thirty points, 20 meters apart from one another, were marked in the crops. At each point, insect pests and natural enemies were collected using the two sampling methods. Faunistic indices, including the average and interval estimates carried out by the resampling method, were calculated for each soybean crop. In the samplings using the beat cloth, richness > dominance = abundance > constancy, and using the entomological nets, richness > dominance > abundance > constancy. All faunistic indices other than dominance were greater when using the beat cloth method than those estimated by the entomological net method. The sample sizes required to estimate richness, constancy, dominance and abundance indices were 38, 78, 47 and more than 300, respectively, with an estimation error of 20 % of the average (p = 0.05). Higher values were observed when entomological net was used.
机译:多样性指数的估计值提供了有关社区内物种分布,丰富度和丰富度的信息。本研究的目的是估计用拍打布和昆虫学净采样方法在不同大豆作物中采集的物种的真菌指数(丰富度,恒定性,优势度和丰度),并确定估计真菌指数所需的样本量。对位于巴西南里奥格兰德州9个城市的100种大豆作物的动物密度进行了评估。庄稼上标出了30个点,彼此相距20米。在每个点,使用两种采样方法收集了害虫和天敌。计算了每种大豆农作物的Funistic指数,包括通过重采样方法执行的平均和间隔估计。在使用拍子布进行的采样中,丰富度>优势度=丰度>恒定度,而使用昆虫学网络的采样率,丰富度>优势度>丰度>恒定度。使用拍子布法时,除优势度以外的所有其他指数均大于通过昆虫学网法估计的指数。估计丰富度,恒定性,优势度和丰度指数所需的样本量分别为38、78、47和300多个,估计误差为平均值的20%(p = 0.05)。使用昆虫学网时观察到更高的值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号