...
首页> 外文期刊>Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery: official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery >Laryngeal reconstruction with a sternohyoid muscle flap after supracricoid laryngectomy: Postoperative respiratory and swallowing evaluation
【24h】

Laryngeal reconstruction with a sternohyoid muscle flap after supracricoid laryngectomy: Postoperative respiratory and swallowing evaluation

机译:喉上切除术后胸骨舌骨瓣皮瓣重建喉的术后呼吸和吞咽评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective. To compare postoperative respiratory and swallowing functions between patients who underwent classic supracricoid laryngectomy (SCL) and those who underwent SCL with laryngeal reconstruction using the sternohyoid muscle. Study Design. Prospective study. Setting. National cancer center. Subjects and Methods. Forty-four patients who consecutively underwent SCL for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma from December 2009 to March 2011 were included. Postoperative parameters including the mean tracheostomy decannulation time, tracheostomy decannulation rate at 6 months, mean nasogastric tube (NGT) removal time, degree of dysphagia at 3 months, and survival time after surgery were evaluated. Results. Twenty-one patients underwent classic SCL (group A), and 23 underwent SCL with laryngeal reconstruction (group B). After a median follow-up period of 37 months (range, 3-44 months), group A had a significantly longer mean decannulation time (120.05 ± 109.38 days vs 33.43 ± 22.60 days, respectively; P <.01) and NGT removal time (37.30 ± 29.97 days vs 17.22 ± 10.95 days, respectively; P <.01) than group B. Swallowing function after ± months was significantly better in group B than in group A (P = .004). The decannulation rate after ± months was significantly higher in group B than in group A (95.7% vs 66.7%, respectively; P = .036). The 3-year disease-free survival rate was not significantly different between group A and group B (95.2% vs 95.7%, respectively; P = .961). Conclusion. Laryngeal reconstruction using a sternohyoid muscle flap seems to improve quality of life in the early postoperative period after SCL.
机译:目的。为了比较接受经典胸锁上喉切除术(SCL)的患者和使用胸骨舌骨肌进行喉重构的SCL患者之间的术后呼吸和吞咽功能。学习规划。前瞻性研究。设置。国家癌症中心。主题和方法。从2009年12月至2011年3月,连续接受SCL喉鳞状细胞癌的44例患者被纳入研究。评估术后参数,包括平均气管切开术脱管时间,6个月时的气管切开术脱皮率,平均鼻胃管(NGT)去除时间,3个月时吞咽困难程度以及术后生存时间。结果。 21例患者接受了经典SCL(A组),而23例接受了喉重建的SCL(B组)。中位随访期为37个月(范围3-44个月)后,A组平均拔管时间明显更长(分别为120.05±109.38天和33.43±22.60天; P <.01)和NGT去除时间(分别为37.30±29.97天和17.22±10.95天; P <.01)。与B组相比,±月后的吞咽功能明显优于A组(P = .004)。 B组±月后的脱皮率显着高于A组(分别为95.7%和66.7%; P = .036)。 A组和B组的3年无病生存率无显着差异(分别为95.2%和95.7%; P = .961)。结论。在SCL术后的早期,使用胸骨舌骨肌皮瓣重建喉部似乎可以改善生活质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号