...
首页> 外文期刊>Safety science >Identification of freeway secondary accidents with traffic shock wave detected by loop detectors
【24h】

Identification of freeway secondary accidents with traffic shock wave detected by loop detectors

机译:用环路探测器探测到的交通冲击波识别高速公路二次事故

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Secondary traffic accidents are generally recorded without being specifically noted as such in the accident database, leading to difficulty in the study of such accidents. Previous research generally classified secondary incidents by predefining fixed spatio-temporal boundaries a method that can be very subjective. Using 10,762 accident records gathered from 2012 upstream loop detector data on a California interstate freeway, this paper proposes a dynamic method for more convincing and accurate classification based on traffic shock waves detected by the loop detectors. This method identifies and associates a secondary accident with its primary accident if it is tested and found to have occurred within the spatio-temporal impact area of the primary accident. Shock waves from each accident are calculated and updated along freeway via multiple detectors, and secondary accidents are identified as those that occur within the spatio-temporal boundaries of a primary accident. Results show that secondary accidents account for 1.08% of California interstate freeway accidents, which is much lower than previous research estimates. Dispersed spatio-temporal gaps between primary and secondary accident pairs were found with an expectation of 71.09 min and 3.88 miles with a standard deviation of 55.36 min and 4.64 miles respectively. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:通常记录第二次交通事故,而没有在事故数据库中对此进行特别说明,从而导致研究此类事故的困难。先前的研究通常通过预定义固定的时空边界来对次要事件进行分类,这是一种非常主观的方法。利用从2012年加利福尼亚州际高速公路上的上游环路探测器数据收集的10,762条事故记录,本文提出了一种动态方法,基于环路探测器检测到的交通冲击波,可以更令人信服和准确地进行分类。如果对第二种事故进行了测试并发现其发生在第一事故的时空影响区域内,则该方法可以将第二事故与第一事故相联系。每个事故的冲击波都通过多个检测器沿高速公路进行计算和更新,而次生事故则被识别为在一次事故的时空边界内发生的那些事故。结果表明,继发事故占加州州际高速公路事故的1.08%,远低于先前的研究估计。发现主要事故和次要事故对之间的时空差异很大,预期为71.09分钟和3.88英里,标准差分别为55.36分钟和4.64英里。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号