...
首页> 外文期刊>Safety science >Evaluating hazard conflicts using inherently safer design concept
【24h】

Evaluating hazard conflicts using inherently safer design concept

机译:使用本质上更安全的设计概念评估危害冲突

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The application of Inherent Safety (IS) principles and Inherently Safer Design (ISD) concept has been proven to reduce the risk of accidents and economically attractive for process plants. However, there are always trade-offs and conflicts that arise from the suggested modifications. An inherently safer design from one perspective could possibly alter the hazards in other dimensions. Therefore, this limitation should be resolved before obtaining the best ISD alternatives. This paper presents a methodology for producing and evaluating Inherently Safer Design (ISD) alternatives using a risk-based approach at preliminary design stage. The proposed methodology is applied to nitration of toluene with the objective of preventing and minimizing runaway reaction. The results have shown that the new tool can capture the risk transferred due to the change of design proposed by the inherent safety principles at preliminary design stage in the form of new hazards and change of magnitude of existing hazards.
机译:已经证明,固有安全性(IS)原理和固有安全性设计(ISD)概念的应用可以降低事故风险,并且对过程工厂具有经济吸引力。但是,建议的修改总是存在权衡和冲突。从一个角度看,一种本质上更安全的设计可能会改变其他方面的危害。因此,应在获得最佳ISD替代方案之前解决此限制。本文介绍了一种在初步设计阶段使用基于风险的方法生成和评估固有安全设计(ISD)替代方法的方法。所提出的方法被用于甲苯的硝化,以防止和最小化失控反应。结果表明,在初步设计阶段,新工具可以捕获由于固有安全原则提出的设计变更而导致的风险转移,包括新的危害和现有危害的大小变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号