首页> 外文期刊>Schizophrenia research >Theory of mind impairments in first-episode psychosis, individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis and in first-degree relatives of schizophrenia: Systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Theory of mind impairments in first-episode psychosis, individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis and in first-degree relatives of schizophrenia: Systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:首发精神病,精神病超高风险人士和精神分裂症一级亲属的心理障碍理论:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Theory of mind (ToM) deficit is a well-established feature of schizophrenia and has been suggested as a vulnerability marker of this disorder. However, as most of this evidence is based on studies in chronic patients, it is less clear whether ToM is impaired prior to or following the onset of a first-episode and whether it is evident in unaffected relatives of patients. In this meta-analysis, ToM performance of 3005 individuals with first-episode psychosis (FEP), individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis (UHR) and unaffected relatives were compared with 1351 healthy controls. ToM was substantially impaired in first-episode psychosis (Cohen d=. 1.0) and this deficit was comparable to findings in chronic patients. ToM was also impaired in unaffected relatives (d=. 0.37) and UHR subjects (d=. 0.45) and performances of these groups were intermediate between FES and healthy controls. Severity of ToM deficits in unaffected relatives and UHR subjects was similar to other cognitive deficits observed in these groups. Longitudinal studies of clinical and genetic high-risk subjects are necessary to investigate the trajectory of development of ToM deficits in schizophrenia. ? 2013 Elsevier B.V.
机译:心理理论(ToM)缺陷是精神分裂症的公认特征,并已被建议作为该疾病的易感性标志。但是,由于大多数证据是基于对慢性患者的研究,因此尚不清楚ToM是否在首发发作之前或之后受损,以及在未受影响的亲属中是否明显。在这项荟萃分析中,将3005名首发精神病(FEP)个体,极高精神病风险(UHR)个体和未受影响亲戚的ToM表现与1351名健康对照者进行了比较。在首发性精神病中,ToM明显受损(Cohen d =。1.0),这种缺陷与慢性患者的发现相当。未受影响的亲戚(d = 0.37)和UHR受试者(d = 0.45)的ToM也受损,并且这些组的表现介于FES和健康对照之间。未受影响的亲属和UHR受试者的ToM缺陷严重程度与在这些组中观察到的其他认知缺陷相似。临床和遗传高危受试者的纵向研究对于调查精神分裂症中ToM缺乏症的发展轨迹是必要的。 ? 2013年Elsevier B.V.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号