首页> 外文期刊>Schizophrenia research >Effects of switching from olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone to aripiprazole on 10-year coronary heart disease risk and metabolic syndrome status: Results from a randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Effects of switching from olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone to aripiprazole on 10-year coronary heart disease risk and metabolic syndrome status: Results from a randomized controlled trial

机译:从奥氮平,喹硫平和利培酮转换为阿立哌唑对10年冠心病风险和代谢综合征状态的影响:一项随机对照试验的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: This study examined the clinical significance of switching from olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone to aripiprazole by examining changes in predicted risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) according to the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) and metabolic syndrome status. FRS estimates 10-year risk of "hard" coronary heart disease (CHD) outcomes (myocardial infarction and coronary death) while metabolic syndrome is associated with increased risk of CVD, stroke, and diabetes mellitus. Method: Changes in FRS and metabolic syndrome status were compared between patients with BMI ≥ 27 and non-HDL-C ≥ 130 mg/dL randomly assigned to stay on stable current treatment (olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone) or switch to treatment with aripiprazole with 24. weeks of follow-up. All study participants were enrolled in a behavioral program that promoted healthy diet and exercise. Results: The pre-specified analyses included 89 switchers and 98 stayers who had post-baseline measurements needed to assess changes. Least squares mean estimates of 10-year CHD risk decreased more for the switch (from 7.0% to 5.2%) than the stay group (from 7.4% to 6.4%) (p = 0.0429). The odds ratio for having metabolic syndrome (stay vs. switch) at the last observation was 1.748 (95% CI 0.919, 3.324, p = 0.0885). Conclusion: Switching from olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone to aripiprazole was associated with larger reductions in predicted 10-year risk of CHD than the behavioral program alone. The advantage of switching on metabolic syndrome was not statistically significant. The benefits of switching must be balanced against its risks, which in this study included more discontinuations of the study treatment but no significant increase in symptoms or hospitalizations.
机译:目的:本研究通过根据弗雷明汉风险评分(FRS)和代谢综合征状态检查心血管疾病预测风险(CVD)的变化,研究了从奥氮平,喹硫平或利培酮转换为阿立哌唑的临床意义。 FRS估计“硬”冠心病(CHD)结局(心肌梗塞和冠状动脉死亡)的十年风险,而代谢综合征与CVD,中风和糖尿病的风险增加相关。方法:比较BMI≥27和非HDL-C≥130 mg / dL的患者,随机分配接受稳定电流治疗(奥氮平,喹硫平或利培酮)或改用阿立哌唑治疗的患者的FRS和代谢综合征状态的变化进行24周的随访。所有研究参与者都参加了促进健康饮食和运动的行为计划。结果:预先指定的分析包括89位转换员和98位滞留者,他们的基线后测量需要评估变化。最小二乘平均估计值对10年CHD风险的转换(从7.0%降低到5.2%)比住宿组(从7.4%降低到6.4%)下降得更多(p = 0.0429)。在最后一次观察中,患有代谢综合征(停留与转换)的几率是1.748(95%CI 0.919,3.324,p = 0.0885)。结论:从奥氮平,喹硫平或利培酮转换为阿立哌唑与预计的10年冠心病风险相比,与单独的行为计划降低相比更大。开启代谢综合征的优势在统计学上并不显着。转换的好处必须与其风险相平衡,在这项研究中,该研究包括更多停用研究治疗药物,但症状或住院率没有明显增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号