首页> 外文期刊>Schizophrenia research >Definition of psychotic disorders in the DSM-5 too radical, too conservative, or just right!
【24h】

Definition of psychotic disorders in the DSM-5 too radical, too conservative, or just right!

机译:DSM-5中精神病的定义过于激进,过于保守或恰到好处!

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this issue of the journal, members of the DSM-5 Psychotic Disorders workgroup address the treatment of psychotic disorders in the DSM-5 and summarize the rationale for changes made from DSM-IV. Since the publication of DSM-IV in 1994, several limitations in its definition of psychotic disorders were recognized, and a substantial body of new data about the nature of psychotic disorders was generated. In a series of six articles, the DSM-5 workgroup members describe the major revisions in the conceptualization and characterization of psychotic disorders in DSM-5 and discuss the logic underlying these modifications. This is followed by three commentaries by schizophrenia experts from three continents - Europe, North America, and Australia - that critically review the treatment of psychotic disorders in the DSM-5.
机译:在本期杂志中,DSM-5精神病工作组的成员讨论了DSM-5中精神病的治疗方法,并总结了DSM-IV进行变更的理由。自1994年DSM-IV出版以来,人们认识到其对精神病的定义存在一些局限性,并且产生了大量有关精神病性质的新数据。在一系列六篇文章中,DSM-5工作组成员描述了DSM-5中精神病的概念化和表征方面的主要修订,并讨论了这些修饰的逻辑基础。随后是来自欧洲,北美和澳大利亚三大洲的精神分裂症专家的三则评论,对DSM-5中精神病的治疗进行了严格审查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号