首页> 外文期刊>San Joaquin Agricultural Law Review >LAND USE AND AGRICULTURAL EXCEPTIONALISM
【24h】

LAND USE AND AGRICULTURAL EXCEPTIONALISM

机译:土地利用与农业例外主义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In Johnson v. M'Intosh, a seminal case1 establishing some of the bases for the American law of real property,2'Chief Justice John Marshall noted in passing that there might be "abstract principles" whereby some types of land use confer upon their practitioners a greater right to the land than those who make different use of it.3 Johnson arose from one of the greatest problems of land use in our national history—the conflict between the North American natives and the expanding European population.4 The European conquest of the continent involved converting "wilderness," which was previously used for hunting and gathering, into agricultural fields.5 New European arrivals in North America believed that agriculture, not hunting and gathering, was the method by which humans possessed land.6 Thus, in the earliest moments of European presence in North America, there arose the problem of divergent and competing land uses at the root of a cultural conflict.
机译:在Johnson v。M'Intosh案中,一个具有开创性的案件1为美国不动产法确立了一些基础2。首席大法官John Marshall顺便指出,可能存在“抽象原则”,某些类型的土地使用赋予其使用权从业者比其他人拥有更大的土地使用权。3约翰逊来自我们国家历史上最大的土地使用问题之一,即北美土著人与欧洲人口膨胀之间的冲突。4欧洲人的征服该大陆的一部分涉及将以前用于狩猎和采集的“荒野”转换为农田。5新来到北美的欧洲人认为,农业而不是狩猎和采集是人类拥有土地的方法。6因此,在欧洲出现在北美的最早时刻,就出现了文化冲突根源上土地用途不同和相互竞争的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号