首页> 外文期刊>Osteoporosis international: a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA >The non-interventional BonViva Intravenous Versus Alendronate (VIVA) study: Real-world adherence and persistence to medication, efficacy, and safety, in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis
【24h】

The non-interventional BonViva Intravenous Versus Alendronate (VIVA) study: Real-world adherence and persistence to medication, efficacy, and safety, in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis

机译:非介入性BonViva静脉对阿仑膦酸钠(VIVA)研究:绝经后骨质疏松症患者对药物,疗效和安全性的真实坚持和坚持

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Adherence and persistence to oral bisphosphonates in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis is suboptimal. In this study, patients were treated with either oral or intravenous bisphosphonates. The increased adherence and persistence observed in patients receiving intravenous medication compared with those receiving oral medication may improve health outcomes. Introduction: Poor adherence and persistence to oral medication are often observed in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO). The purpose of the non-interventional BonViva Intravenous Versus Alendronate (VIVA) study was to determine whether, in a real-world setting, (1) increased adherence and persistence to medication would be observed in women with PMO receiving intravenous (i.v.) ibandronate versus oral alendronate, (2) a correlation exists between adherence and persistence to medication and drug efficacy, and (3) any unexpected adverse events/serious adverse events (AEs/SAEs) may occur. Methods: The study was conducted in 632 centers in Germany. A total of 6,064 females with PMO were enrolled and recruited into one of two treatment arms: quarterly i.v. administration of 3 mg ibandronate or weekly oral medication of 70 mg alendronate, for 12 months. At the end of the study, adherence and persistence to medication, new osteoporotic fractures, mobility, use of analgesics, and AEs/SAEs were determined. Results: Greater adherence and persistence to medication were observed in the ibandronate treatment arm compared with the alendronate treatment arm. Although there was no significant difference in the number of patients with new vertebral, hip, or forearm fractures between treatment arms, a significantly greater increase in mobility and decrease in the use of analgesics were reported in the ibandronate treatment arm. No unexpected AEs/SAEs occurred in either arm. Conclusions: Adherence and persistence to medication were greater in women with PMO receiving i.v. ibandronate compared with those receiving oral alendronate. This may have led to an increase in mobility and a decrease in pain in these patients.
机译:绝经后骨质疏松症妇女对口服双膦酸盐的依从性和持久性欠佳。在这项研究中,患者接受了口服或静脉注射双膦酸盐治疗。与接受口服药物治疗的患者相比,接受静脉药物治疗的患者观察到的依从性和持久性增加,可能会改善健康状况。简介:绝经后骨质疏松症(PMO)妇女经常观察到对口服药物的依从性和持久性差。非介入性BonViva静脉对阿仑膦酸盐(VIVA)研究的目的是确定在现实环境中(1)PMO接受静脉注射(iv)伊班膦酸vs.口服阿仑膦酸盐,(2)对药物的依从性和持久性与药物疗效之间存在相关性,(3)可能发生任何意外的不良事件/严重的不良事件(AEs / SAEs)。方法:该研究在德国的632个中心进行。共有6064名患有PMO的女性被纳入并招募到以下两个治疗部门之一:服用3毫克伊班膦酸盐或每周口服70毫克阿仑膦酸盐,持续12个月。在研究结束时,确定了药物的依从性和持久性,新的骨质疏松性骨折,活动性,镇痛药的使用以及AEs / SAEs。结果:与阿仑膦酸盐治疗组相比,伊班膦酸治疗组观察到更大的药物依从性和持久性。尽管治疗组之间新的椎骨,髋部或前臂骨折的患者人数没有显着差异,但伊班膦酸盐治疗组据报道活动性明显增加,而止痛药的使用却减少了。两只手臂均未发生意外的AE / SAE。结论:PMO接受静脉注射的女性对药物的依从性和持久性更高。与接受口服阿仑膦酸盐治疗的患者相比,伊班膦酸盐比较。这可能导致这些患者的活动性增加和疼痛减轻。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号