...
首页> 外文期刊>Osteoporosis international: a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA >Quality of life and health status with zoledronic acid and generic alendronate - A secondary analysis of the Rapid Onset and Sustained Efficacy (ROSE) study in postmenopausal women with low bone mass
【24h】

Quality of life and health status with zoledronic acid and generic alendronate - A secondary analysis of the Rapid Onset and Sustained Efficacy (ROSE) study in postmenopausal women with low bone mass

机译:唑来膦酸和通用阿仑膦酸盐的生活质量和健康状况-对低骨量绝经后妇女的快速起效和持续疗效(ROSE)研究的二级分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Summary The ROSE study compared annual infusion with zoledronic acid and weekly generic alendronate. No significant differences in quality of life or health status between treatment groups were observed. Adherence to alendronate during the study was high, with 80.9% of patients achieving adequate adherence. Introduction A secondary analysis to evaluate quality of life, health status, adherence to alendronate and therapy preference in postmenopausal women with low bone mass who received treatment with zoledronic acid or alendronate was conducted. Methods Postmenopausal women with low bone mass were randomised 2:1 to receive an annual infusion of zoledronic acid or weekly oral generic alendronate in this open-label, multicentre study. Changes in quality of life and health status were assessed using questionnaires at baseline and month 12. Adherence to alendronate was assessed by the investigator and/or study personnel, and subjective therapy preference was assessed using a questionnaire at month 12. Results Patients were randomised to zoledronic acid (n=408) and alendronate (n=191). Overall, there were no significant differences in quality of life between zoledronic acid and alendronate. However, improvements in quality of life with zoledronic acid versus alendronate could be detected by posthoc analysis in patients with previous fractures. There were no significant differences in health status between patients receiving zoledronic acid or alendronate. Adherence to alendronate during the study was high, with 80.9% of patients achieving adequate adherence. A total of 81% of patients who had received zoledronic acid indicated that they would prefer to continue with that treatment, and 43% of the patients who received oral alendronate would like to switch to zoledronic acid. Conclusions There were no significant differences in quality of life between patients receiving zoledronic acid or alendronate.
机译:总结ROSE研究比较了唑来膦酸和每周通用阿仑膦酸盐的年度输注。治疗组之间的生活质量或健康状况没有显着差异。在研究期间对阿仑膦酸盐的依从性很高,有80.9%的患者达到了适当的依从性。前言进行了二次分析,以评估接受唑来膦酸或阿仑膦酸盐治疗的低骨量绝经后妇女的生活质量,健康状况,对阿仑膦酸盐的依从性和治疗偏好。方法在这项开放性,多中心研究中,将绝经后低骨量的妇女按2:1的比例随机分配,以每年接受唑来膦酸或每周一次口服通用阿仑膦酸盐的输注。在基线和第12个月使用问卷调查法评估生活质量和健康状况的变化。研究人员和/或研究人员评估阿仑膦酸盐的依从性,并在第12个月使用问卷调查法评估主观疗法的偏爱。唑来膦酸(n = 408)和阿仑膦酸盐(n = 191)。总体而言,唑来膦酸和阿仑膦酸盐的生活质量没有显着差异。然而,通过对先前骨折患者的事后分析,可以发现唑来膦酸和阿仑膦酸盐相比生活质量得到改善。接受唑来膦酸或阿仑膦酸钠治疗的患者之间的健康状况无显着差异。在研究期间对阿仑膦酸盐的依从性很高,有80.9%的患者达到了适当的依从性。总共81%接受唑来膦酸治疗的患者表示愿意继续接受该治疗,而43%口服阿仑膦酸盐的患者则希望改用唑来膦酸。结论接受唑来膦酸或阿仑膦酸盐治疗的患者在生活质量上无显着差异。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号