首页> 外文期刊>Organometallics >COMPETITIVE REDUCTIVE ELIMINATION OF C-H AND SI-H BONDS FROM IRH(SIHPH(2))(MES)(CO)(DPPE) - COMPARISON OF THE KINETIC ACTIVATION PARAMETERS FOR REDUCTIVE ELIMINATIONS IN IR-III(DPPE) COMPLEXES
【24h】

COMPETITIVE REDUCTIVE ELIMINATION OF C-H AND SI-H BONDS FROM IRH(SIHPH(2))(MES)(CO)(DPPE) - COMPARISON OF THE KINETIC ACTIVATION PARAMETERS FOR REDUCTIVE ELIMINATIONS IN IR-III(DPPE) COMPLEXES

机译:从IRH(SIHPH(2))(MES)(CO)(DPPE)中竞争性消除C-H和SI-H键

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The complex IrH(SiHPh(2))(mes)(CO)(dppe) (1; mes = 2,4,6-trimethylphenyl; dppe = bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane) undergoes competing irreversible mesitylene and reversible diphenylsilane reductive eliminations in benzene, leading to the known Ir complexes Ir(mes)(CO)(dppe) and IrH(SiHPh(2))(2)(CO)(dppe) (2). The kinetics for the C-H vs Si-H competitive reductive eliminations have been studied and indicate that both reactions follow simple first-order kinetics, For mesitylene reductive elimination, Delta H-double dagger = 21.8 +/- 0.3 kcal mol(-1), Delta S-double dagger = -5.0 +/- 1.1 eu, and Delta G(298)(double dagger) = 23.3 +/- 0.4 kcal mol(-1), while for diphenylsilane reductive elimination, Delta H-double dagger = 15.6 +/- 0.5 kcal mol(-1), Delta S-double dagger = -25.2 +/- 1.1 eu, and Delta G(298)(double dagger) = 23.1 +/- 0.6 kcal mol(-1). A striking similarity exists among the kinetic parameters for diphenylsilane reductive elimination from 1 and for H-2 reductive eliminations from IrH2(C2H5)(CO)(dppe) (5) and IrH2(C(O)C2H5)(CO)(dppe) (6). To determine if a kinetic similarity for silane and H-2 reductive eliminations-exists among Ir-III (dppe) complexes, the kinetic parameters for triethylsilane reductive elimination from IrH2(Si(C2H5)(3))(CO)(dppe) (7) and H-2 reductive elimination from IrH2(SiHPh(2))(CO)(dppe) (8) were determined. For triethylsilane reductive elimination from 7, Delta H-double dagger = 29.2 +/- 0.3 kcal mol(-1), Delta S-double dagger = 12.8 +/- 0.9 eu, and Delta G(298)(double dagger) = 25.4 +/- 0.4 kcal mol(-1). For H-2 reductive elimination from 8, Delta H-double dagger = 25.2 +/- 0.7 kcal mol(-1), Delta S-double dagger = -4.2 +/- 2.1 eu, and Delta G(298)(double dagger) = 26.4 +/- 0.9 kcal mol(-1). The negative entropies of activation for Si-H and H-H reductive eliminations are rationalized in terms of sigma-complex formation prior to dissociation. [References: 82]
机译:复杂的IrH(SiHPh(2))(mes)(CO)(dppe)(1; mes = 2,4,6-三甲基苯基; dppe =双(二苯基膦基)乙烷)经历竞争性不可逆均三甲苯和可逆二苯硅烷在苯中的还原消除导致已知的Ir络合物Ir(mes)(CO)(dppe)和IrH(SiHPh(2))(2)(CO)(dppe)(2)。已研究了CH与Si-H竞争性还原消除的动力学,并表明两个反应均遵循简单的一级动力学;对于均三甲苯还原消除,Delta H-双匕首= 21.8 +/- 0.3 kcal mol(-1), Delta S-双匕首= -5.0 +/- 1.1 eu,Delta G(298)(双匕首)= 23.3 +/- 0.4 kcal mol(-1),而对于二苯硅烷还原消除,Delta H-双匕首= 15.6 +/- 0.5 kcal mol(-1),Delta S-双匕首= -25.2 +/- 1.1 eu和Delta G(298)(double dagger)= 23.1 +/- 0.6 kcal mol(-1)。从1去除二苯硅烷和从IrH2(C2H5)(CO)(dppe)(5)和IrH2(C(O)C2H5)(CO)(dppe)还原H-2的动力学参数之间存在惊人的相似性(6)。为了确定Ir-III(dppe)配合物之间是否存在硅烷和H-2还原消除的动力学相似性,从IrH2(Si(C2H5)(3))(CO)(dppe)还原三乙基硅烷的动力学参数( 7)和从IrH2(SiHPh(2))(CO)(dppe)(8)中进行H-2还原消除的测定。对于从7,的三乙基硅烷还原消除,Delta H-双匕首= 29.2 +/- 0.3 kcal mol(-1),Delta S-双匕首= 12.8 +/- 0.9 eu和Delta G(298)(double dagger)= 25.4 +/- 0.4 kcal mol(-1)。对于从8去除H-2的还原反应,Delta H-双匕首= 25.2 +/- 0.7 kcal mol(-1),Delta S-双匕首= -4.2 +/- 2.1 eu和Delta G(298)(double dagger) )= 26.4 +/- 0.9 kcal mol(-1)。 Si-H和H-H还原消除反应的负熵根据解离前sigma络合物的形成合理化。 [参考:82]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号