首页> 外文期刊>Osiris >Negotiating Global Nuclearities: Apartheid, Decolonization, and the Cold War in the Making of the IAEA
【24h】

Negotiating Global Nuclearities: Apartheid, Decolonization, and the Cold War in the Making of the IAEA

机译:谈判全球核:种族隔离,非殖民化与国际原子能机构建立中的冷战

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Throughout most of its history, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has been portrayed as a technical agency in which geopolitics are either extraneous or inappropriate. This chapter argues that this separation of technology and politics was discursive and never enacted in practice. Looking at the role of South Africa in the early history of the agency, this chapter shows that the IAEA's technopolitical regime was the continually contested outcome of negotiations between visions of a hierarchical, bipolar global order structured by cold war tensions and visions of a decentralized global order inspired by decolonization. This chapter also explores how dynamics between the apartheid state, decolonizing nations, and the United States inflected the meanings and implications of the "nuclear" in IAEA technopolitics. "Nuclearity"-that is, the degree to which a nation, a program, a policy, a technology, or even a material counted as "nuclear"-was a spectrum, not an on-off condition. Both nuclearity and its implications emerged in substantive ways from the dynamics between cold war and postcolonial visions of the world.
机译:在其整个历史过程中,国际原子能机构(IAEA)被描述为一个地缘政治无关或不合适的技术机构。本章认为,技术与政治的这种分离是话语权,并且在实践中从未实现。从南非在该机构早期历史中的作用来看,本章表明,国际原子能机构的技术政治体制是由冷战紧张局势构成的分立的,两极的全球秩序的愿景与权力下放的全球愿景之间的谈判的有争议的结果非殖民化激发了秩序。本章还探讨了种族隔离国家,非殖民化国家和美国之间的动态如何影响“原子核”在原子能机构技术政治中的含义和含意。 “核”,即一个国家,一个计划,一项政策,一项技术,甚至一种材料被视为“核”的程度,是一个频谱,而不是通断条件。从冷战到世界后殖民观之间的动态,核及其含义都以实质性方式出现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号