首页> 外文期刊>Organic Geochemistry: A Publication of the International Association of Geochemistry and Cosmochemistry >Absence of a significant bias towards summer temperature in branched tetraether-based paleothermometer at two soil sites with contrasting temperature seasonality
【24h】

Absence of a significant bias towards summer temperature in branched tetraether-based paleothermometer at two soil sites with contrasting temperature seasonality

机译:在两个土壤站点的分支四醚基古温度计中,夏季温度没有明显的偏差,且温度季节性不同

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It is unclear whether or not the paleotemperature proxies based on the branched glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers (brGDGTs) in soil exhibits any seasonal bias in temperature reconstruction. To test this, we examined the brGDGT distributions and compared the mean annual air temperature (MAAT) estimates inferred from the brGDGT-based paleothermometers for surface soils from Nanyang (NY) and Kunming (KM), two sites in China with similar MAAT, but with contrasting climate seasonality (i.e. different summer and winter temperatures). If a significant bias towards summer or winter temperature were to occur, the soils from the locality with stronger seasonality would be expected to yield different temperature estimates than those from the other locality. The results show that, at a regional isothermal scale, the most important environmental control on the soil brGDGT distribution is pH at NY but soil water content (SWC) at KM, suggesting a regional difference in the key environmental control on the brGDGT distributions. MBT' and CBT are both controlled primarily by pH at NY but by SWC at KM. In contrast, the MBT'(5ME) index, known to be dependent on MAAT alone, displays no relationship with pH or SWC at both sites, allowing us to evaluate the impact of temperature seasonality. MBT'(5ME) is statistically higher at the NY soils than at the KM soils; a MBT'(5ME) difference of 0.04 units is equivalent to a difference of ca. 1.3 degrees C in MAAT. Likewise, the MAAT(mr) estimates produced from multiple linear regression calibration for the two soil sites differ by only 0.8 degrees C. This suggests that there is no significant bias towards summer temperature in the brGDGT-based paleothermometer as the mean summer temperature differs by 6.4 degrees C at the two soil sites. By extension, temperature reconstructed from the brGDGT-based proxies for the loess-paleosol sequences in the southern Chinese Loess Plateau is unlikely to be biased towards summer. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:尚不清楚土壤中基于支化甘油二烷基甘油四醚(brGDGTs)的古温度代理在温度重建中是否表现出任何季节性偏差。为了验证这一点,我们检查了brGDGT的分布,并比较了基于brGDGT的古温度计测量的平均年气温(MAAT)估算值,该值来自中国两个地点具有相似MAAT的南阳(NY)和昆明(KM)的表层土壤,但是与气候季节(相反的夏季和冬季温度)不同。如果要对夏季或冬季的温度产生明显的偏差,则预计来自季节性较强的地区的土壤将产生与其他地区不同的温度估算值。结果表明,在区域等温规模上,对土壤brGDGT分布最重要的环境控制是纽约州的pH值,而在KM处的土壤水分含量(SWC),表明对brGDGT分布的关键环境控制存在区域差异。 MBT'和CBT都主要受NY的pH值控制,而受KM的SWC值控制。相反,已知仅依赖于MAAT的MBT'(5ME)指数在两个位置上均与pH值或SWC无关,这使我们能够评估温度季节性的影响。据统计,MBT'(5ME)在纽约州土壤中比在KM土壤中高; 0.04单位的MBT'(5ME)差等于大约ca. MAAT中为1.3摄氏度。同样,对两个土壤位点进行的多元线性回归校准得出的MAAT(mr)估算值相差仅0.8摄氏度。这表明基于brGDGT的古温度计在夏季温度上没有显着偏差,因为夏季平均温度相差两个土壤位点为6.4摄氏度。通过扩展,从基于brGDGT的代表重建的中国黄土高原黄土古土壤序列的温度不太可能偏向夏季。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号