【24h】

Comparison of the effectiveness of two enhanced glaucoma referral schemes.

机译:比较两种增强型青光眼转诊计划的有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Citation information: Parkins DJ & Edgar DF. Comparison of the effectiveness of two enhanced glaucoma referral schemes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2011, 31, 343-352. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00853.x ABSTRACT: Purpose: To compare the clinical and financial effectiveness of two optometric-led enhanced glaucoma referral schemes in the Bexley Care Trust area. Methods: Over a 12-month period all suspect glaucoma/Ocular Hypertension (OHT) referrals from optometrists relating to patients registered with Bexley GPs were analysed. All these patients were examined under one of two schemes. One was an enhanced glaucoma repeat measurement (EGRM) scheme in which the referring optometrist conducted the repeated tests him/herself prior to referral or non-referral. The alternative was a refinement pathway (RCAS) using a small team of accredited community optometrists. Results: During the full year commencing April 2007, repeat measures using the EGRM scheme resulted in 76% of patients not being referred. In 44.5% of all EGRM patients, where raised intraocular pressure (IOP) was found by non-contact tonometry (NCT), repeated measurement by Goldmann/Perkins applanation tonometry resulted in readings that were <22 mmHg, or that had less than a 5 mmHg difference between the two eyes. Financial review demonstrated that the EGRM achieved 62% savings when compared with HES tariff while RCAS resulted in a saving of 3.5%. Conclusions: Using a primary care repeat measurement scheme to support referral decision-making demonstrated substantial cost benefit while onward referral for refinement by accredited optometrists was essentially cost-neutral compared with HES tariff. Local schemes foster fragmentation and consideration should be given to a service which covers a large population area.
机译:引用信息:Parkins DJ和Edgar DF。比较两种增强型青光眼转诊计划的有效性。眼科Opt 2011,31,343-352。 doi:10.1111 / j.1475-1313.2011.00853.x摘要:目的:比较Bexley Care Trust区域内两种由验光师主导的增强型青光眼转诊计划的临床和财务有效性。方法:在过去的12个月中,分析了所有与Bexley GP登记患者有关的验光师的可疑青光眼/高眼压(OHT)转诊。所有这些患者均根据两种方案之一进行检查。一种是增强型青光眼重复测量(EGRM)方案,其中推荐的验光师在推荐或不推荐之前对其进行了重复测试。替代方法是使用一小队经过认可的社区验光师进行细化处理(RCAS)。结果:从2007年4月开始的全年中,使用EGRM方案的重复措施导致76%的患者未得到转诊。在通过非接触式眼压计(NCT)发现眼内压(IOP)升高的所有EGRM患者中,有44.5%的患者通过Goldmann / Perkins压平眼压计重复测量得出的读数小于22 mmHg或小于5两只眼睛之间的mmHg差。财务审查表明,与HES关税相比,EGRM节省了62%,而RCAS则节省了3.5%。结论:使用基层医疗重复测量方案来支持转诊决策显示出可观的成本收益,而由合格验光师进行转诊进行细化与HES费率相比基本上是成本中立的。地方计划助长了支离破碎,应考虑覆盖人口众多的服务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号