...
首页> 外文期刊>Operative dentistry >Clinical evaluation of three desensitizing agents in relieving dentin hypersensitivity.
【24h】

Clinical evaluation of three desensitizing agents in relieving dentin hypersensitivity.

机译:三种脱敏剂缓解牙本质过敏的临床评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVES: This in vivo study determined whether the application of three different desensitizing agents on exposed dentin surfaces was effective in reducing dentin hypersensitivity in subjects with slight-to-moderate sensitivity. METHODS: Sixty patients with a history of sensitivity were included in this study. At baseline visit, the initial sensitivity levels were recorded using a visual analog scale (VAS). In order to activate the sensitivity, evaporative (air-blast) and thermal (chloraethyl) stimuli were applied to each subject. The subjects' responses to the stimuli were marked on the VAS. Then, the subjects were assigned to one of the treatment groups or to a placebo. The agents used were Seal&Protect (Dentsply DeTrey GmbH, Konstanz, Germany), Vivasens (Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein) and BisBlock (BISCO, Schaumburg, IL, USA); whereas, distilled water was used as the placebo. The subjects were recalled after four weeks, and their responses were again recorded. Results: The VAS scoresof the treatment and placebo groups were not different from each other at baseline (p > 0.05), and thermal stimuli caused higher patient discomfort than evaporative stimuli (p < 0.05). Alleviation effects of the desensitizing agents were not significantly different from each other; however, the placebo was an exception (p < 0.05). The differences between the VAS scores at baseline and after four weeks were significant for all three desensitizing agents (p < 0.05). However, in the placebo group, the evaporative stimuli led to insignificant pain variations (p > 0.05). Conclusion: It was concluded that the desensitizing agents used in this clinical study were effective in alleviating dentin hypersensitivity. Meanwhile, the placebo response was shown to play a significant role.
机译:目的:这项体内研究确定了在裸露的牙本质表面上使用三种不同的脱敏剂是否能有效降低轻度至中度敏感性受试者的牙本质超敏性。方法:本研究纳入了60名有敏感病史的患者。在基线访视时,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)记录初始敏感性水平。为了激活敏感性,对每个受试者施加蒸发(鼓风)和热(氯乙基)刺激。在VAS上标记出受试者对刺激的反应。然后,将受试者分配到治疗组之一或安慰剂中。所用的试剂是Seal&Protect(Dentsply DeTrey GmbH,德国康斯坦茨),Vivasens(Ivoclar Vivadent AG,列支敦士登,Schaan)和BisBlock(BISCO,Schaumburg,IL,美国);而蒸馏水被用作安慰剂。四周后召回受试者,并再次记录他们的反应。结果:治疗组和安慰剂组的VAS评分在基线时无差异(p> 0.05),热刺激引起的患者不适感高于蒸发刺激(p <0.05)。脱敏剂的缓解效果没有明显的不同。但是,安慰剂是一个例外(p <0.05)。对于所有三种脱敏剂,基线和四周后的VAS评分之间的差异均显着(p <0.05)。然而,在安慰剂组中,蒸发刺激导致微不足道的疼痛变化(p> 0.05)。结论:结论:本临床研究中使用的脱敏剂可有效缓解牙本质过敏。同时,显示安慰剂反应起重要作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号