...
首页> 外文期刊>Operative dentistry >Influence of application techniques on contact formation and voids in anterior resin composite restorations.
【24h】

Influence of application techniques on contact formation and voids in anterior resin composite restorations.

机译:施加技术对前树脂复合修复体中接触形成和空隙的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This study evaluated the influence of three different application techniques on contact formation and voids in anterior resin composite restorations. Artificial ivorine teeth were randomly assigned to three experimental groups, with 20 specimens in each group. One operator performed all restorations using the Teflon tape, pull-through, or bioclear matrix technique. The treatment time required for each restoration was recorded. An examiner blinded to the treatment group performed the visual evaluation of six criteria, including proper contact formation. The restored teeth were cut to yield a total of 180 sections for microscopic evaluation. The Kruskal-Wallis procedure was performed to evaluate the significance of treatment time, number of voids, percent porosity area, and void diameter. There were significant differences in treatment time among the three groups (p<0.05). The bioclear matrix technique required the least time for the treatment of one diastema closure (p<0.05). The Teflon tape technique resulted in proper contact formation in 80% of specimens, a rate that was significantly lower than that associated with the pull-through and bioclear matrix techniques (p<0.05). Out of 540 imaging areas 160 images were free of voids. The number of voids and the percent porosity area were not significantly different among the three techniques (p>0.05). However, the mean void diameter was greater with the bioclear matrix technique compared to the other two techniques (p<0.05).
机译:这项研究评估了三种不同的应用技术对前树脂复合修复体中接触形成和空隙的影响。人造象牙牙被随机分为三个实验组,每组20个标本。一名操作员使用特氟龙胶带,穿通法或生物透明基质技术进行了所有修复。记录每次修复所需的治疗时间。对治疗组不知情的检查员对包括适当接触形成在内的六个标准进行了视觉评估。切开修复的牙齿,以产生总共180个切片用于显微镜评估。进行Kruskal-Wallis程序以评估处理时间,空隙数量,孔隙率百分比和空隙直径的重要性。三组之间的治疗时间有显着差异(p <0.05)。生物透明基质技术需要最少的时间来治疗一种扩张性闭塞(p <0.05)。铁氟龙胶带技术可在80%的样品中形成适当的接触,该速率显着低于与穿通法和生物透明基质技术相关的速率(p <0.05)。在540个成像区域中,有160个图像没有空隙。三种技术之间的空隙数和孔隙率百分比无显着差异(p> 0.05)。但是,与其他两种技术相比,使用生物透明基质技术的平均空隙直径更大(p <0.05)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号