首页> 外文期刊>Operative dentistry >Effect of dentin-cleaning techniques on the shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin luting cement to dentin.
【24h】

Effect of dentin-cleaning techniques on the shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin luting cement to dentin.

机译:牙本质清洁技术对自粘树脂胶结水泥与牙本质的剪切粘结强度的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE : This in vitro study evaluated the influence of different cleansing techniques on the bond strength of self-adhesive cement to dentin. METHODS AND MATERIALS : A total of 33 noncarious human molars were sectioned mesiodistally and embedded in chemically cured resin with the buccal or lingual surfaces facing upward. Superficial dentin was exposed and resin disk provisional restorations were cemented to the dentin surfaces with noneugenol provisional cement and were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C. After seven days, the provisional restorations were removed and 13 specimens were randomly assigned to each of the five groups (n=13), according to the following cleansing treatments: G1-excavator (control); G2-0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate; G3-40% polyacrylic acid; G4-mixture of flour pumice and water; and G5-sandblasting with 50 mum aluminum oxide particles at a pressure of 87 psi. Resin composite disks (Filtek Supreme Plus, 3M ESPE Dental Products, St Paul, MN, USA) 4.7 (+/-0.1) mm in diameter and 3.0 (+/-0.5) mm in height were cemented with self-adhesive cement (RelyX Unicem, 3M ESPE), photocured, and stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 24 hours. Shear bond strength testing was conducted using a universal test machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min until failure. RESULTS : Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey-B rank order test. Sandblasting with aluminum oxide (11.32 +/- 1.70 MPa) produced significantly higher shear bond strength values compared with any other treatment groups (p<0.05). No significant differences were found between G1-control (7.74 +/- 1.72 MPa), G2-chlorhexidine (6.37 +/- 1.47 MPa), and G4-pumice (7.33 +/- 2.85 MPa) (p<0.05).
机译:目的:这项体外研究评估了不同清洁技术对自粘水泥与牙本质粘合强度的影响。方法和材料:将近33个非龋齿人类臼齿进行近中切,并以化学或固化的树脂包埋,颊或舌表面朝上。暴露表面牙本质,用非丁香酚临时胶粘剂将树脂盘临时修复体粘合到牙本质表面,并储存在37摄氏度的蒸馏水中。七天后,将临时修复体移除,将13个样本随机分配给五个根据以下清洁处理方法分组(n = 13):G1挖掘机(对照); G2-0.12%洗必泰二葡萄糖酸酯; G3-40%聚丙烯酸; G4-面粉浮石和水的混合物;然后在87 psi的压力下用50um氧化铝颗粒进行G5喷砂处理。树脂复合材料圆盘(Filtek Supreme Plus,3M ESPE牙科产品,美国明尼苏达州圣保罗)直径4.7(+/- 0.1)毫米,高3.0(+/- 0.5)mm的树脂用自粘水泥(RelyX Unicem,3M ESPE),进行光固化,并在37摄氏度的蒸馏水中保存24小时。使用万能试验机以0.5mm / min的十字头速度进行剪切粘结强度测试,直到失效。结果:使用方差分析(ANOVA)和Tukey-B等级顺序检验分析数据。与其他处理组相比,用氧化铝(11.32 +/- 1.70 MPa)喷砂产生的剪切粘结强度值明显更高(p <0.05)。在G1对照(7.74 +/- 1.72 MPa),G2-洗必太(6.37 +/- 1.47 MPa)和G4-浮石(7.33 +/- 2.85 MPa)之间没有发现显着差异(p <0.05)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号