...
首页> 外文期刊>Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics >Complications after zygoma fracture fixation: is there a difference between biodegradable materials and how do they compare with titanium osteosynthesis?
【24h】

Complications after zygoma fracture fixation: is there a difference between biodegradable materials and how do they compare with titanium osteosynthesis?

机译:zygoma骨折固定术后的并发症:可生物降解材料之间是否有区别,它们与钛骨合成法相比如何?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Biodegradable materials are particularly useful for the fixation of zygomatic fractures. Different systems are commercially available. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcome of zygomatic fracture fixation using 3 biodegradable systems and a titanium osteosynthesis system. STUDY DESIGN: Patients with displaced fractures of the zygomatic bone presenting at our department from October 2001 to May 2003 were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 treatment groups for fracture fixation (study group A: LactoSorb: n = 18; study group B: BioSorb: n = 18; study group C: Delta: n = 18). Treatment outcome and complication rates were compared with a historic patient group with zygomatic fractures fixed with titanium osteosynthesis (control group D: n = 15). RESULTS: A total of 64 patients (study groups A + B + C: n = 49; control group D: n = 15) were followed for at least 24 months (range: 24 to 44 months). Forty-nine patients in the biodegradable study groups (group A: n = 15; group B: n = 17; group C: n = 17) who had their fractures fixed with biodegradable plates and screws alone or in combination with titanium plates and screws were reviewed postoperatively. Uneventful healing occurred during the entire follow-up period in 39 (80%) out of 49 patients in the biodegradable groups (A + B + C) and in 12 (80%) out of 15 patients in group D. Ten patients in groups A + B + C developed postoperative complications (infection: n = 3; soft tissue dehiscence: n = 2; implant-related tissue reactions: n = 5), compared with 3 patients in group D (soft tissue dehiscence: n = 1; unspecific pain: n = 2) (P = .97). Complications occurred in 4 patients in group A and 3 patients each in groups B and C. Smokers developed significantly more postoperative complications than nonsmokers in groups A + B + C (P = .01). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between biodegradable osteosynthesis materials or between biodegradable materials and titanium fixation with respect to fracture healing and postoperative complications. Postoperative complications were of a minor nature and resolved spontaneously or after local therapy. Smoking habits may play a significant role in the incidence of complications with biodegradable materials.
机译:目的:可生物降解材料在骨骨折的固定中特别有用。不同的系统是可商购的。这项研究的目的是比较使用3种可生物降解系统和钛骨合成系统进行zy骨骨折固定的临床效果。研究设计:2001年10月至2003年5月在我科就诊的with骨移位性骨折患者被随机分配到3个治疗组中的1个进行骨折固定(研究组A:LactoSorb:n = 18;研究组B:BioSorb: n = 18;研究组C:Delta:n = 18)。将治疗结果和并发症发生率与既往有with骨骨折并固定钛骨的历史患者组进行比较(对照组D:n = 15)。结果:总共64例患者(研究组A + B + C:n = 49;对照组D:n = 15)被随访了至少24个月(范围:24至44个月)。可生物降解研究组中的四十九例患者(A组:n = 15; B组:n = 17; C组:n = 17)的骨折单独用可生物降解板和螺钉固定,或与钛板和螺钉结合固定术后进行复查。在整个随访期间,可生物降解组(A + B + C)的49例患者中有39例(80%)发生了平稳的愈合,D组的15例患者中有12例(80%)发生了治愈。D组中的10例A + B + C发生了术后并发症(感染:n = 3;软组织开裂:n = 2;与植入物相关的组织反应:n = 5),而D组中有3名患者(软组织开裂:n = 1;软组织​​开裂:n = 1;软组织​​开裂:n = 1。非特异性疼痛:n = 2)(P = 0.97)。 A组中有4例发生并发症,B和C组中分别有3例发生并发症。吸烟者比A + B + C组中的不吸烟者显着增加了术后并发症(P = .01)。结论:在骨折愈合和术后并发症方面,可生物降解的骨合成材料之间或可生物降解的材料与钛固定之间没有显着差异。术后并发症为次要性质,可自发解决或在局部治疗后解决。吸烟习惯可能在可生物降解材料并发症的发生中起重要作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号