首页> 外文期刊>Optics & Laser Technology >Comparison of several stochastic parallel optimization algorithms for adaptive optics system without a wavefront sensor
【24h】

Comparison of several stochastic parallel optimization algorithms for adaptive optics system without a wavefront sensor

机译:无波前传感器的自适应光学系统几种随机并行优化算法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Optimizing the system performance metric directly is an important method for correcting wavefront aberrations in an adaptive optics (AO) system where wavefront sensing methods are unavailable or ineffective. An appropriate "Deformable Mirror" control algorithm is the key to successful wavefront correction. Based on several stochastic parallel optimization control algorithms, an adaptive optics system with a 61-element Deformable Mirror (DM) is simulated. Genetic Algorithm (GA), Stochastic Parallel Gradient Descent (SPGD), Simulated Annealing (SA) and Algorithm Of Pattern Extraction (Alopex) are compared in convergence speed and correction capability. The results show that all these algorithms have the ability to correct for atmospheric turbulence. Compared with least squares fitting, they almost obtain the best correction achievable for the 61-element DM. SA is the fastest and GA is the slowest in these algorithms. The number of perturbation by GA is almost 20 times larger than that of SA, 15 times larger than SPGD and 9 times larger than Alopex.
机译:直接优化系统性能指标是一种在波前传感方法不可用或无效的自适应光学(AO)系统中校正波前像差的重要方法。合适的“可变形镜”控制算法是成功进行波前校正的关键。基于几种随机并行优化控制算法,对带有61元素可变形镜(DM)的自适应光学系统进行了仿真。比较了遗传算法(GA),随机平行梯度下降(SPGD),模拟退火(SA)和模式提取算法(Alopex)的收敛速度和校​​正能力。结果表明,所有这些算法均具有校正大气湍流的能力。与最小二乘拟合相比,它们几乎可以获得61元素DM可获得的最佳校正。在这些算法中,SA最快,而GA最慢。 GA的扰动次数几乎比SA大20倍,比SPGD大15倍,比Alopex大9倍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号