首页> 外文期刊>Ophthalmology >Comparison of Epi-LASIK and off-flap Epi-LASIK for the treatment of low and moderate myopia.
【24h】

Comparison of Epi-LASIK and off-flap Epi-LASIK for the treatment of low and moderate myopia.

机译:Epi-LASIK与近端皮瓣Epi-LASIK治疗中低度近视的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare the early postoperative course and the 1-year clinical results of off-flap Epi-LASIK and Epi-LASIK for the treatment of low and moderate myopia. DESIGN: Pilot double-masked, randomized, comparative study. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-six patients (112 myopic eyes). METHODS: Epithelium was separated in all eyes with the use of Centurion SES epikeratome (Norwood Abbey EyeCare, Vic, Australia). The first eye treated and surgical method in the first eye were randomized. One eye of each patient underwent standard Epi-LASIK, whereas in the contralateral eye, the epithelial sheet was not retained on the photoablated stroma (off-flap Epi-LASIK eyes). Mean preoperative spherical equivalent was -3.50+/-1.22 diopters (D; range, -1.75 to -6.37 D) in Epi-LASIK eyes and -3.61+/-1.22 D (range, -1.50 to -6.50 D) in off-flap Epi-LASIK eyes (P>0.05, paired Student t test). Excimer laser corneal ablation was performed using the Allegretto 200Hz (Wavelight Laser Technologie AG, Erlangen, Germany). Patients werefollowed up daily until the epithelial healing was complete and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Epithelial healing time, subjective pain score, and uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) were evaluated during the first postoperative days. Uncorrected visual acuity, spherical equivalent refraction, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, haze scores, and wavefront aberrations were recorded at all subsequent intervals. RESULTS: Time of epithelial healing did not differ significantly in Epi-LASIK and off-flap Epi-LASIK eyes (4.76+/-0.84 days in Epi-LASIK eyes vs. 4.54+/-0.93 days in off-flap Epi-LASIK eyes). No significant difference in UCVA was found after the 2 techniques during the first postoperative days. Subjective pain score was lower in off-flap Epi-LASIK eyes at 2 postoperative hours, whereas no significant difference in pain scores was noted between the 2 techniques at the other intervals. There was no significant difference in spherical equivalent, line gain or loss, haze scores, and higher-order aberrations between Epi-LASIK and off-flap Epi-LASIK eyes at any interval. Uncorrected visual acuity was significantly better in Epi-LASIK eyes only at 6 months (-0.05+/-0.08 in Epi-LASIK eyes vs. 0.00+/-0.07 in off-flap Epi-LASIK eyes). Preoperative wavefront aberrations did not change significantly 1 year after either procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Epi-LASIK and off-flap Epi-LASIK had equal visual and refractive results for the treatment of low and moderate myopia in this study. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
机译:目的:比较皮瓣下Epi-LASIK和Epi-LASIK治疗中低度近视的术后早期病程和1年临床结果。设计:先导双掩蔽,随机对照研究。参加者:56名患者(112只近视眼)。方法:使用Centurion SES epikeratome(澳大利亚维多利亚州诺伍德修道院眼科医院)将所有眼睛的上皮分离。对第一只眼的治疗方法和第一只眼的手术方法进行了随机分组。每位患者的一只眼睛接受标准Epi-LASIK手术,而对侧眼中,上皮片未保留在光消融基质上(皮瓣Epi-LASIK眼)。 Epi-LASIK眼的术前平均球镜当量为-3.50 +/- 1.22屈光度(D;范围-1.75至-6.37 D),离眼-E- Epi-LASIK眼皮瓣(P> 0.05,成对的t检验)。使用Allegretto 200Hz(德国Erlangen的Wavelight Laser Technologie AG)进行准分子激光角膜消融术。每天随访患者直至上皮愈合完全,并在1、3、6和12个月时进行。主要观察指标:术后第一天评估上皮愈合时间,主观疼痛评分和未矫正视敏度(UCVA)。在所有随后的时间间隔中记录未矫正的视力,球面等效屈光度,最佳眼镜矫正的视力,雾度得分和波前像差。结果:Epi-LASIK和非皮瓣Epi-LASIK眼的上皮愈合时间没有显着差异(Epi-LASIK眼为4.76 +/- 0.84天,而皮瓣Epi-LASIK眼为4.54 +/- 0.93天)。术后第一天使用这两种技术后,UCVA没有发现显着差异。术后2小时离瓣Epi-LASIK眼的主观疼痛评分较低,而在其他间隔时,两种技术之间的疼痛评分没有显着差异。在任何间隔下,Epi-LASIK眼和皮瓣Epi-LASIK眼的球当量,线增益或损耗,雾度得分和高阶像差均无显着差异。仅在第6个月时,Epi-LASIK眼的未矫正视敏度显着更好(Epi-LASIK眼为-0.05 +/- 0.08,而皮瓣Epi-LASIK眼为0.00 +/- 0.07)。两种方法术后一年,术前波前像差均无明显变化。结论:本研究中Epi-LASIK和皮瓣Epi-LASIK在治疗中低度近视方面具有相同的视觉和屈光效果。财务披露:在参考文献之后可以找到专有或商业披露。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号