...
首页> 外文期刊>Ophthalmology >Comparing predictability between eyes after bilateral laser in situ keratomileusis: a theoretical analysis of simultaneous versus sequential procedures.
【24h】

Comparing predictability between eyes after bilateral laser in situ keratomileusis: a theoretical analysis of simultaneous versus sequential procedures.

机译:比较双侧激光原位角膜磨镶术后双眼之间的可预测性:同时手术与顺序手术的理论分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare the predictability of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) between eyes of individuals to determine whether the refractive result of the first eye is useful in improving fellow eye outcomes. DESIGN: Single-center case series. PARTICIPANTS: One surgeon and 196 eyes of 98 patients. INTERVENTION: All patients received sequential bilateral LASIK. The mean time between procedures was 11.6 days. Attempted corrections ranged from 2.30 to 12.00 diopters (D). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Predictability (achieved minus attempted correction), postoperative manifest refraction, and theoretical postoperative manifest refraction, using a proposed attempted correction on the second eye based on first eye results, were analyzed. RESULTS: At 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months, predictability of the first operated eye was correlated with predictability of the fellow eye (1 week: mean 1st = 0.33 D, mean 2nd = 0.33 D, Pearson coefficient = 0.46, P < 0.0005; 1 month: mean 1st = 0.028 D, mean 2nd = -0.020 D, Pearson coefficient = 0.43, P < 0.0005; 3 months: mean 1st = -0.22 D, mean 2nd = -0.12 D, Pearson coefficient = 0.52, P < 0.0005). At the 3-month follow-up of the second eye, comparing the actual distance from emmetropia with that calculated using a theoretical proposed attempted correction based on the first eye refraction, distance from emmetropia was closer in the theoretical correction group. This finding was stronger in patients with preoperative myopia less than 5.5 D (P = 0.03). For this group, 93% of patients in the proposed attempted correction group would fall within 1.0 D of emmetropia compared to 80% found in the actual outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The refractive predictability between the two eyes of an individual after LASIK is correlated. Theoretically, therefore, one may be able to achieve correction closer to emmetropia in the second eye by applying the refractive predictability results from the first operated eye. In this study, using a theoretical proposed attempted correction in the second eye based on the first eye outcome, we have shown that better outcomes in the second eye are possible, particularly in low myopes. Thus, it may be advantageous to perform bilateral LASIK sequentially rather than simultaneously, using predictability outcomes from the first operated eye in planning fellow eye treatment. Moreover, waiting approximately 1 week was found to be potentially as effective as waiting longer periods of time between treatments. Further studies are necessary to better assess the actual clinical significance of these findings.
机译:目的:比较个人眼睛之间的激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)的可预测性,以确定第一只眼的屈光结果是否有助于改善另一只眼的结局。设计:单中心表壳系列。对象:98位患者的一名外科医生和196眼。干预:所有患者均接受了顺序性双侧LASIK。两次手术之间的平均时间为11.6天。尝试的校正范围为2.30到12.00屈光度(D)。主要观察指标:分析了可预测性(达到的未尝试矫正),术后明显屈光度和理论上的术后明显屈光度,使用了根据第一只眼的结果对第二只眼进行的拟议矫正。结果:在第1周,第1个月和第3个月,第一只手术眼的可预测性与另一只眼睛的可预测性相关(1周:平均第一眼= 0.33 D,平均第二眼= 0.33 D,皮尔森系数= 0.46,P < 0.0005; 1个月:平均1st = 0.028 D,平均2nd = -0.020 D,皮尔逊系数= 0.43,P <0.0005; 3个月:平均1st = -0.22 D,平均2nd = -0.12 D,Pearson系数= 0.52,P <0.0005)。在第二只眼的3个月随访中,将实际距正视距离与使用理论上建议的基于第一只眼屈光度的尝试矫正所计算的距离进行比较,在理论矫正组中距正视距离更近。小于5.5 D的术前近视患者的这一发现更为明显(P = 0.03)。对于该组,建议的尝试矫正组中有93%的患者会落在正视眼的1.0 D以内,而实际结果中这一比例为80%。结论:LASIK术后个体两只眼睛之间的屈光可预测性相关。因此,从理论上讲,通过应用第一只手术眼睛的屈光可预测性结果,人们可能能够在第二只眼睛的正视眼附近实现矫正。在这项研究中,使用理论上建议的基于第一只眼结果的第二只眼尝试矫正,我们已经证明第二只眼有更好的结果是可能的,特别是在近视度数低的情况下。因此,在计划其他眼部治疗时,使用第一只手术眼的可预测性结果,顺次而不是同时进行双侧LASIK可能是有利的。而且,发现等待大约1周与等待两次治疗之间更长的时间同样有效。为了更好地评估这些发现的实际临床意义,有必要进行进一步的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号