首页> 外文期刊>Ophthalmology >Prevalence and 5- to 6-year incidence and progression of myopia and hyperopia in Australian schoolchildren
【24h】

Prevalence and 5- to 6-year incidence and progression of myopia and hyperopia in Australian schoolchildren

机译:澳大利亚学童近视和远视的患病率以及5至6年的发病率和进展

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To determine the prevalence, incidence, and change in refractive errors for Australian schoolchildren and examine the impact of ethnicity and sex. Design: Population-based cohort study. Participants: The Sydney Adolescent Vascular and Eye Study, a 5- to 6-year follow-up of the Sydney Myopia Study, examined 2760 children in 2 age cohorts, 12 and 17 years. Longitudinal data were available for 870 and 1202 children in the younger and older cohorts, respectively. Methods: Children completed a comprehensive examination, including cycloplegic autorefraction (cyclopentolate 1%; Canon RK-F1). Myopia was defined as ≤-0.50 diopters (D) and hyperopia as ≥+2.00 D right eye spherical equivalent refraction. Main Outcome Measures: Baseline and follow-up refraction. Results: Prevalence of myopia increased between baseline and follow-up for both the younger (1.4%-14.4%; P<0.0001) and older cohorts (13.0%-29.6%; P<0.0001). The annual incidence of myopia was 2.2% in the younger cohort and 4.1% in the older. Children of East Asian ethnicity had a higher annual incidence of myopia (younger 6.9%, older 7.3%) than European Caucasian children (younger 1.3%, older 2.9%; all P<0.0001). The prevalence of myopia in European Caucasian children almost doubled between the older (4.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.0-5.8) and younger samples (8.6%; 95% CI, 6.7-10.6) when both were aged 12 years. Children with ametropia at baseline were more likely to have a significant shift in refraction (hyperopia: odds ratio [OR], 3.4 [95% CI, 1.2-9.8]; myopia: OR, 6.3 [95% CI, 3.7-10.8]) compared with children with no refractive error. There was no significant difference in myopia progression between children of European Caucasian and East Asian ethnicity (P = 0.7). Conclusions: In Sydney, myopia prevalence (14.4%, 29.6%) and incidence (2.2%, 4.1%) was low for both age cohorts, compared with other locations. However, in European Caucasian children at age 12, the significantly higher prevalence of myopia in the younger sample suggests a rise in prevalence, consistent with international trends. Progression of myopia was similar for children of East Asian and European Caucasian ethnicity, but lower than reported in children of East Asian ethnicity in East Asia, suggesting that environmental differences may have some impact on progression. Financial Disclosure(s): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any of the materials discussed in this article.
机译:目的:确定澳大利亚学童的屈光不正的患病率,发生率和变化,并检查种族和性别的影响。设计:基于人群的队列研究。参与者:悉尼青少年近视研究的5至6年跟踪研究“悉尼青少年血管和眼睛研究”,对2760名12岁和17岁年龄组的2760名儿童进行了检查。纵向数据分别适用于年龄较小和年龄较大的队列中的870和1202名儿童。方法:儿童完成了一次全面检查,包括睫状肌麻痹的验光(环戊酸酯1%;佳能RK-F1)。近视定义为≤-0.50屈光度(D),远视定义为≥+ 2.00 D右眼球等效屈光度。主要观察指标:基线和后续验光。结果:年轻人群(1.4%-14.4%; P <0.0001)和老年人群(13.0%-29.6%; P <0.0001)在基线和随访之间近视患病率增加。年轻一代的近视年发病率为2.2%,老年人为4.1%。东亚族裔儿童的近视年发病率较高(年轻人为6.9%,年龄较大为7.3%),比欧洲白人儿童(年轻人为1.3%,年龄较大2.9%;所有P <0.0001)。当年龄均在12岁以下的欧洲高加索儿童中,近视患病率在年龄较大(4.4%; 95%置信区间[CI],3.0-5.8)和年龄较小的样本(8.6%; 95%CI,6.7-10.6)之间几乎翻了一番。基线患有屈光不正的儿童屈光度更可能发生重大变化(近视:优势比[OR],3.4 [95%CI,1.2-9.8];近视:OR,6.3 [95%CI,3.7-10.8])与没有屈光不正的儿童相比。欧洲高加索人和东亚族裔儿童的近视进展无显着差异(P = 0.7)。结论:在悉尼,两个年龄段的近视患病率(14.4%,29.6%)和发生率(2.2%,4.1%)均低于其他地区。但是,在欧洲12岁的白种人儿童中,较年轻的样本中近视患病率明显较高,这表明患病率有所上升,与国际趋势一致。东亚和欧洲高加索族裔儿童的近视进展相似,但低于东亚东亚族裔儿童的报道,这表明环境差异可能对进展产生一些影响。财务披露:作者对本文讨论的任何材料均没有所有权或商业利益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号