首页> 外文期刊>Optometry and vision science: official publication of the American Academy of Optometry >Clinical value of the Beery visual-motor integration supplemental tests of visual perception and motor coordination.
【24h】

Clinical value of the Beery visual-motor integration supplemental tests of visual perception and motor coordination.

机译:Beery视觉感知和运动协调性视觉-运动整合补充测试的临床价值。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: Children may perform poorly on a test of visual-motor integration due to deficits in one or more of the following: visual analysis/visual spatial ability, motor coordination, visual conceptualization, or visual-motor integration. The VMI Supplemental Developmental Test of Visual Perception (VP) and VMI Supplemental Developmental Test of Motor Coordination (MC) were developed to help differentiate between such difficulties after administration of the Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration (VMI). However, the clinical value of the VMI supplemental tests has not been reported. METHOD: The VMI, VP, and MC were administered to 193 children (mean age = 8.77 years). RESULTS: Multiple linear regression revealed that the supplemental tests were significantly related to the VMI (VP: beta = 0.212 +/- 0.044, p < 0.001; MC: beta = 0.422 +/- 0.299, p < 0.001) but explained only 36.2% of the variance in the VMI. Poor performance was defined as a score >1 SD below the mean for study population norms and below the 16th percentile for published norms. Using study population norms, 35 children did poorly on the VMI, 20% of whom scored poorly on VP, 14.3% of whom scored poorly on MC, 17.1% of whom scored poorly on both supplemental tests, and 48.6% of whom scored within normal on both supplemental tests. Using the published norms, 40 children scored poorly on the VMI. Twenty-eight children scored poorly on VP, 39% of whom scored within normal on the VMI. Fifty-six children scored poorly on MC, 54% of whom scored within normal on the VMI. CONCLUSION: There was a significant amount of variance in performance on the VMI that was not explained by performance on the tests of VP or MC alone. Each area should be individually assessed during the visual perceptual examination of children, regardless of performance on the VMI. Even children who perform within normal limits on the VMI may show a deficit in VP or MC.
机译:目的:由于以下一项或多项缺陷,儿童在视觉-运动整合测试中可能表现不佳:视觉分析/视觉空间能力,运动协调,视觉概念化或视觉-运动整合。开发了视觉感知的VMI补充发展测试(VP)和运动协调性的VMI补充发展测试(MC),以帮助在服用Beery-Buktenica视觉-运动整合发展测试(VMI)后区分这些困难。但是,尚未报告VMI补充测试的临床价值。方法:对193名儿童(平均年龄= 8.77岁)施行了VMI,VP和MC。结果:多元线性回归显示补充测试与VMI显着相关(VP:beta = 0.212 +/- 0.044,p <0.001; MC:beta = 0.422 +/- 0.299,p <0.001),但仅解释了36.2% VMI中的方差。绩效不佳的定义是:研究人群标准的平均值低于1 SD,而已发表的标准的评分低于16%。根据研究人群标准,有35名儿童的VMI成绩较差,其中20%的儿童在VP上得分较差,14.3%的儿童在MC上得分较差,17.1%的儿童在两项补充测验中得分均差,并且48.6%的儿童在正常范围内得分在两个补充测试中。根据已发布的准则,有40名儿童在VMI上得分较差。 28名儿童的VP得分很低,其中39%的VMI得分在正常范围内。 56名儿童的MC得分很低,其中54%的VMI得分在正常范围内。结论:VMI上的性能差异很大,而仅凭VP或MC的性能无法解释。无论对VMI的表现如何,在对儿童进行视觉感知检查时,应对每个区域进行单独评估。甚至在VMI正常范围内表现的儿童也可能显示VP或MC不足。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号