...
首页> 外文期刊>Obesity surgery >Oximetry alone versus portable polygraphy for sleep apnea screening before bariatric surgery.
【24h】

Oximetry alone versus portable polygraphy for sleep apnea screening before bariatric surgery.

机译:减肥手术前单独进行血氧测定与便携式测谎仪进行睡眠呼吸暂停筛查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Screening for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is recommended as part of the preoperative assessment of obese patients scheduled for bariatric surgery. The objective of this study was to compare the sensitivity of oximetry alone versus portable polygraphy in the preoperative screening for OSA. METHODS: Polygraphy (type III portable monitor) and oximetry data recorded as part of the preoperative assessment before bariatric surgery from 68 consecutive patients were reviewed. We compared the sensitivity of 3% or 4% desaturation index (oximetry alone) with the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI; polygraphy) to diagnose OSA and classify the patients as normal (<10 events per hour), mild to moderate (10-30 events per hour), or severe (>30 events per hour). RESULTS: Using AHI, the prevalence of OSA (AHI > 10 per hour) was 57.4%: 16.2% of the patients were classified as severe, 41.2% as mild to moderate, and 42.6% as normal. Using 3% desaturation index, 22.1% were classified as severe, 47.1% as mild to moderate, and 30.9% as normal. With 4% desaturation index, 17.6% were classified as severe, 32.4% as mild, and 50% as normal. Overall, 3% desaturation index compared to AHI yielded a 95% negative predictive value to rule out OSA (AHI > 10 per hour) and a 100% sensitivity (0.73 positive predictive value) to detect severe OSA (AHI > 30 per hour). CONCLUSIONS: Using oximetry with 3% desaturation index as a screening tool for OSA could allow us to rule out significant OSA in almost a third of the patients and to detect patients with severe OSA. This cheap and widely available technique could accelerate preoperative work-up of these patients.
机译:背景:建议对肥胖患者进行减肥手术前进行术前评估,以筛查阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)。这项研究的目的是比较术前筛查OSA时单独使用血氧测定法和便携式测谎仪的敏感性。方法:回顾了在连续进行的减肥手术之前对68例患者进行的复写检查(III型便携式监护仪)和血氧测定数据,作为术前评估的一部分。我们将3%或4%的饱和度降低指数(仅使用血氧饱和度法)与呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI;测谎)的敏感性进行了比较,以诊断OSA并将患者分类为正常(每小时<10个事件),轻度至中度(10每小时30个事件)或严重(每小时30个事件)。结果:使用AHI,OSA的患病率(AHI> 10每小时)为57.4%:16.2%的患者被分类为严重,41.2%为轻度至中度,42.6%为正常。使用3%的去饱和指数,将22.1%归为严重,47.1%归为轻度至中度,30.9%归为正常。饱和指数为4%时,重度分类为17.6%,轻度分类为32.4%,正常分类为50%。总体而言,与AHI相比,去饱和指数为3%时,排除OSA的阴性预测值为95%(AHI> 10每小时),对重症OSA的敏感性为100%(AHI> 30每小时)(0.73阳性阳性预测值)。结论:使用饱和度为3%的血氧饱和度作为OSA的筛查工具,可以使我们排除近三分之一患者的OSA显着,并检测出严重OSA的患者。这种廉价且广泛可用的技术可以加速这些患者的术前检查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号