首页> 外文期刊>Ophthalmic Surgery and Lasers >A comparative study of small incision trabeculectomy avoiding tenon's capsule with conventional trabeculectomy.
【24h】

A comparative study of small incision trabeculectomy avoiding tenon's capsule with conventional trabeculectomy.

机译:小切口小梁切除术与常规小梁切除术避免使用腱囊的比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the results of small incision trabeculectomy (SIT) avoiding Tenon's capsule vis-a-vis conventional trabeculectomy, and find a safe, effective alternative to conventional trabeculectomy with or without pharmacological wound modulation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A controlled prospective study was conducted on 80 consecutive open-angle glaucoma patients requiring glaucoma filtration surgery. They were divided into two groups: Group I (n = 40): patients undergoing conventional trabeculectomy; and Group II (n = 40): patients undergoing limbal approach SIT. Patients were followed up serially for a minimum of 12 months and their intraocular pressure was monitored. Success of the procedure was defined as an intraocular pressure (IOP) <22 mm Hg with no additional antiglaucoma medication or surgery, and achieving at least a 30% reduction from the initial IOP at which optic disc cupping and/or visual field changes occurred. RESULTS: A significant fall (P <0.0001) in the final mean IOP was present in both groups at all time intervals in comparison to their preoperative values. The final mean intraocular pressure achieved with conventional trabeculectomy was 18.90 +/- 4.86 mm Hg versus 16.60 +/- 5.93 mm Hg with SIT. The final success rate of 90% was obtained with SIT vs 80% with conventional trabeculectomy. No major complications were encountered with either procedure although complications such as shallow anterior chamber and progression of cataractogenesis were seen more often in patients undergoing conventional trabeculectomy. CONCLUSION: Small incision trabeculectomy avoiding Tenon's capsule is a low-cost and safe alternative to conventional trabeculectomy that effectively reduces IOP in 90% of cases. The use of a small 2.5 mm limbal incision, which obviates the dissection of Tenon's capsule and absence of any major complication, suggests that this procedure be used more often in glaucomatous eyes needing filtering surgery.
机译:背景与目的:本研究的目的是比较小切口小梁切除术(SIT)与传统的小梁切除术相比避免使用Tenon囊的小切口切除术的结果,并找到一种安全有效的替代传统小梁切除术的方法,无论有无药理伤口调节。患者与方法:对80例需要青光眼滤过手术的连续开角型青光眼患者进行了一项对照前瞻性研究。他们分为两组:第一组(n = 40):接受常规小梁切除术的患者;第二组(n = 40):接受角膜缘入路SIT的患者。连续随访患者至少12个月,并监测其眼压。手术成功的定义是眼压(IOP)<22 mm Hg,无需额外的抗青光眼药物或手术,并且比发生视盘拔罐和/或视野改变的初始IOP至少降低30%。结果:与术前值相比,两组在所有时间间隔的最终平均眼压均显着下降(P <0.0001)。常规小梁切除术的最终平均眼压为18.90 +/- 4.86 mm Hg,而采用SIT的为16.60 +/- 5.93 mm Hg。 SIT的最终成功率为90%,而常规小梁切除术的最终成功率为80%。两种方法均未遇到重大并发症,尽管在接受常规小梁切除术的患者中,诸如前房浅和白内障发生进展等并发症更为常见。结论避免使用Tenon囊的小切口小梁切除术是传统小梁切除术的低成本安全替代方案,可有效降低90%的IOP。使用小的2.5mm角膜缘切口可消除Tenon囊的解剖,并且不存在任何重大并发症,这表明该方法更常用于需要滤过手术的青光眼。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号