...
首页> 外文期刊>Oncology reports >Validity of bone marker measurements for monitoring response to bisphosphonate therapy with zoledronic acid in metastatic breast cancer
【24h】

Validity of bone marker measurements for monitoring response to bisphosphonate therapy with zoledronic acid in metastatic breast cancer

机译:骨标记物测量在监测转移性乳腺癌对唑来膦酸双膦酸盐治疗反应的有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Bone is the most common site of metastasis in breast cancer. Detection relies on imaging technology which is costly and can only be performed to a certain degree. Bone markers are non-invasive, inexpensive and may potentially serve as predictive and prognostic surrogate endpoints in detecting bone metastases and response to bisphosphonates. This study analyzed the value of the serum bone turnover markers PINP and ICTP for bone metastases in metastatic breast cancer patients receiving zoledronic acid. The results were compared with the serum levels of CEA and CA 15-3, and analyzed with respect to the number of bone metastases as well as clinical response. Forty patients with confirmed bone metastases who received chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy and zoledronic acid i.v. q4 weeks participated in the present study. Blood (5 ml) was collected at the start of the study and q3 months for a period of one year for the analysis of PINP, ICTP, CEA and CA 15-3 using radioimmunoassays and ELISA, respectively. Imaging of bone metastases was performed at the same time points. In 29 out of 40 patients, more than 3 bone metastases were confirmed by imaging and 11 out of 40 patients presented with 3 or less. At the start of the study, the median value for ICTP was 6 μg/l and for PINP 58.7 μg/l. At the end of the study the median values were 4.5 μg/l for ICTP and 21 μg/l for PINP. When patients were stratified into responders and non-responders, a decrease in both PINP (P<0.0001) and ICTP (P=0.048) was observed for the responders, while the level of ICTP (P=0.02) increased for the non-responders. Serum PINP and ICTP concentrations were significantly different when patients were stratified into groups of those having more than 3 bone metastases and 3 or less, respectively (P<0.05). CEA and CA 15-3 levels did not differ with respect to the number of bone metastases, while the tumor marker levels determined at the end of the study significantly distinguished responders from non-responders (P=0.002 and P=0.004). In conclusion, in contrast to serum tumor markers, the determination of PINP and ICTP allows inferences to the number of bone metastases and appears to be a useful tool for prediction and monitoring metastatic breast cancer patients undergoing bisphosphonate therapy with zoledronic acid for the treatment of bone metastases.
机译:骨是乳腺癌中最常见的转移部位。检测依赖于昂贵的成像技术,并且只能在一定程度上执行。骨标记物是非侵入性的,廉价的,并且可能在检测骨转移和对双膦酸盐的反应中作为预测和预后的替代终点。本研究分析了接受唑来膦酸治疗的转移性乳腺癌患者血清骨转换标志物PINP和ICTP对骨转移的价值。将结果与CEA和CA 15-3的血清水平进行比较,并就骨转移的数量和临床反应进行分析。 40例确诊为骨转移的患者接受了化疗和/或激素疗法和唑来膦酸静脉内注射。第4周参加了本研究。在研究开始时和每3个月采集一次血液(5 ml),为期一年,分别使用放射免疫分析法和ELISA分析PINP,ICTP,CEA和CA 15-3。在相同的时间点进行骨转移的影像学检查。 40例患者中有29例经影像学证实有3例以上的骨转移,40例患者中有11例有3例或更少。在研究开始时,ICTP的中值为6μg/ l,PINP的中值为58.7μg/ l。在研究结束时,ICTP的中位数值为4.5μg/ l,PINP的中位数值为21μg/ l。将患者分为反应者和非反应者时,反应者的PINP(P <0.0001)和ICTP均降低(P = 0.048),而非反应者的ICTP水平(P = 0.02)升高。当将患者分为骨转移多于3个且小于或等于3个的组时,血清PINP和ICTP浓度显着不同(P <0.05)。 CEA和CA 15-3水平在骨转移数目方面没有差异,而在研究结束时确定的肿瘤标志物水平则明显区分了反应者和非反应者(P = 0.002和P = 0.004)。总之,与血清肿瘤标志物相比,PINP和ICTP的确定可以推断出骨转移的数量,并且似乎是预测和监测接受唑来膦酸双膦酸盐治疗的转移性乳腺癌患者的有用工具转移。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号