...
首页> 外文期刊>Oncology letters >Bevacizumab-containing regimens after cetuximab failure in Kras wild-type metastatic colorectal carcinoma
【24h】

Bevacizumab-containing regimens after cetuximab failure in Kras wild-type metastatic colorectal carcinoma

机译:西妥昔单抗失败后克拉斯野生型转移性结直肠癌患者的含贝伐单抗治疗方案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Bevacizumab and cetuximab both improve treatment efficacy when administered with chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC). Cetuximab has enhanced efficacy in Kras wild-type tumors. However, inferior outcomes have been demonstrated concerning the concurrent use of bevacizumab and cetuximab with chemotherapy. There is an urgent need to define the optimal sequence of use of these two agents. With regard to the pre-clinical data that increased VEGF expression is associated with acquired resistance to anti-EGFR antibody, we performed a retrospective analysis on the outcomes of patients who received bevacizumab-containing regimens after cetuximab failure in Kras wild-type mCRC. From January 2006 to December 2011, patients who received bevacizumab-containing regimens for mCRC in our institution were reviewed. Patients were eligible for further analysis if the following criteria were met: i) Kras wild-type mCRC; ii) chemotherapy and cetuximab received as immediate prior treatment; iii) chemotherapy and bevacizumab received as the index line of treatment; and iv) imaging conducted for response evaluation. Outcome measures included median progression-free survival (mPFS) and objective response rate (ORR). Targeted adverse events were recorded in accordance with two prospective observational cohort studies; the BRiTE and BEAT studies. Fifty patients who received bevacizumab-containing regimens were reviewed and 18 of them met the criteria for further analysis. After a median follow-up of 12.1 months, the mPFS for the total group of patients was 26.3 weeks (95% CI, 19.5-33.0 weeks) with an ORR of 38.9%. Two patients (11.1%) had hypertension that required additional anti-hypertensive drugs and one patient did not survive due to a bowel perforation. No arterial thromboembolic events (ATEs), post-operative wound-healing complications (POWHCs) or grade III/IV bleeding were observed. In patients with Kras wild-type mCRC, bevacizumab-containing regimens following cetuximab failure have modest activity and manageable toxicity.
机译:贝伐单抗和西妥昔单抗在转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)的化疗中均能提高治疗效果。西妥昔单抗在Kras野生型肿瘤中具有增强的功效。但是,关于贝伐单抗和西妥昔单抗与化学疗法并用的不良结果已被证实。迫切需要定义这两种试剂的最佳使用顺序。关于增加的VEGF表达与获得性抗EGFR抗体耐药性相关的临床前数据,我们对在克拉斯野生型mCRC中接受西妥昔单抗治疗后接受含贝伐单抗治疗的患者的结局进行了回顾性分析。从2006年1月至2011年12月,对在我们机构接受含贝伐单抗mCRC方案的患者进行了回顾。如果符合以下标准,则患者有资格进行进一步分析:i)Kras野生型mCRC; ii)立即接受化疗和西妥昔单抗治疗; iii)接受化疗和贝伐单抗作为治疗的指标线; iv)进行成像以评估反应。结果指标包括中位无进展生存期(mPFS)和客观缓解率(ORR)。根据两项前瞻性观察队列研究记录了靶向不良事件。 BRiTE和BEAT研究。回顾了接受贝伐单抗治疗的50名患者,其中18名符合进一步分析的标准。中位随访12.1个月后,整个患者组的mPFS为26.3周(95%CI,19.5-33.0周),ORR为38.9%。两名患者(11.1%)患有高血压,需要额外的降压药,而一名患者由于肠穿孔而无法生存。没有观察到动脉血栓栓塞事件(ATEs),术后伤口愈合并发症(POWHCs)或III / IV级出血。在患有Kras野生型mCRC的患者中,西妥昔单抗治疗失败后的含贝伐单抗治疗方案具有中等活性和可控制的毒性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号