首页> 外文期刊>Oil and Gas Reporter >Dormant Minerals Act: Georgia
【24h】

Dormant Minerals Act: Georgia

机译:休眠矿物法:佐治亚州

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In 1922 a tract of land is conveyed to L.G. Hardman, Sr. with the grantor reserving a 1/2 interest in the minerals. In 1939, the son of the grantee purchases that previously reserved 1/2 mineral interest. In 1960, a judicial decree relating to a partition of various interests held by members of the Hardman family awards title to the surface and 1/2 of the minerals to Emma Thomson, and awards title to the remaining 1/2 mineral estate to L.G. Hardman, Jr. Both Thomson and Hardman, Jr. die, and in 2008 the successors in interest to the Thomson Estate file this action seeking to assert ownership over the 1/2 minerals owned by successors to Hardman, Jr. through application of the Georgia Dormant Minerals Act (OCGA § 44-5-168). The trial court awards title in the 1/2 minerals to the successors in interest to Thomson. Held: affirmed. The Dormant Minerals Act divests owners of mineral estates who do not use them nor pay taxes for a period of seven years. There is no evidence that Hardman, Jr. or his successors in interest paid taxes or otherwise used and or developed their 1/2 mineral estate. The court rejects their claim that the Act does not apply to fractional mineral interests since such an interpretation would defeat the purpose of the Act. The court also rejects a claim that the plaintiffs should be equitably estopped from seeking to terminate the defendants' mineral interest. While the land had been jointly leased at one time for mineral development, the last lease expired more than seven years prior to the filing of this action.
机译:1922年,一片土地被运送到L.G.高级哈德曼(Hardman,Sr.),设保人保留矿物质的1/2权益。 1939年,受赠人的儿子购买了以前保留的1/2矿产权益。 1960年,与哈德曼家族成员所拥有的各种权益划分有关的一项司法法令将表层所有权和1/2种矿物授予艾玛·汤姆森,而将剩余的1/2种矿物所有权授予L.G.。小哈德曼(Hardman,Jr.)都死了,汤姆森庄园(Thomson Estate)感兴趣的继承人于2008年提起了这项诉讼,试图通过申请佐治亚州来主张小继承哈德曼(Hardman)的继承人拥有的1/2种矿物的所有权休眠矿产法(OCGA§44-5-168)。初审法院将汤姆森感兴趣的继承人授予1/2种矿物的所有权。举行:肯定。 《休眠矿产法》撤消了七年内不使用矿产或不纳税的矿产所有者。没有证据表明哈德曼(J. Hardman,Jr.)或其继承人的利息已缴税或以其他方式使用和/或开发了其1/2矿产。法院驳回了他们的主张,即该法案不适用于部分矿产权益,因为这种解释会违背该法案的目的。法院还驳回了要求公平地停止原告寻求终止被告矿产权益的主张。土地曾一次被联合租用以进行矿产开发,但最后一次租约在提起诉讼前已逾7年。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号