首页> 外文期刊>Oil and Gas Reporter >Court Jurisdiction, Procedure and Review: Class Action
【24h】

Court Jurisdiction, Procedure and Review: Class Action

机译:法院的管辖权,程序和审查:集体诉讼

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In May 2001, Dobbins files a class action petition in Oklahoma state court against ExxonMobil and Mobil Exploration & Producing, North America. The class definition includes owners of a "royalty interest" in the oil and gas underlying certain Oklahoma land on which ExxonMobil Oil Corporation operates oil and gas wells. The putative class seeks damages for breach of contract, breach of the unitization plan, conversion, fraud, breach of fiduciary duties, and for a violation of the Oklahoma Production Revenue Standards Act The putative class also seeks equitable relief in the form of an accounting and a constructive trust. More than three years later, in October 2004, Mannering and two other individuals, all of whom are apparently included in the proposed class definition outlined in the state action, file a similar, though not identical, class action in federal district court against the same two defendants. That putative class also includes royalty interest owners of oil and gas in the same Oklahoma land, but the class is denned more broadly than the putative class in state court.
机译:2001年5月,Dobbins向俄克拉荷马州法院提起了针对埃克森美孚公司和北美美孚石油勘探与生产公司的集体诉讼请求。该类别定义包括在埃克森美孚石油公司经营石油和天然气井的俄克拉荷马州某些土地下的油气的“权益”所有者。假定的阶级要求赔偿因违反合同,违反统一计划,转换,欺诈,违反信托义务以及违反《俄克拉荷马州生产收入标准法》而引起的损害。假定的阶级还要求以会计和建设性的信任。三年多以后,即2004年10月,Mannering和另外两名个人(显然都包括在州诉讼中概述的拟议的集体定义中)在联邦地方法院针对同一案件提起了类似但并非完全相同的集体诉讼。两名被告。该推定类别还包括同一俄克拉荷马州土地上的石油和天然气的特许权使用人,但该类别的定义比州法院的推定类别更为广泛。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号