...
首页> 外文期刊>Oil and Gas Reporter >Joint Operating Agreements:Exculpatory Clause;Operator Liability
【24h】

Joint Operating Agreements:Exculpatory Clause;Operator Liability

机译:联合运营协议:免责条款;运营商责任

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Wendell Reeder is the operator of oil and gas leases in the Forest Hill Field located in Wood County, Texas per the terms of a 1989 form AAPL Model Form 610 Joint Operating Agreement (JOA). After execution of the JOA, Reeder faces claims by non-operators that he failed to maintain production in paying quantities, causing the leases—potentially worth millions of dollars—to expire and the Texas Railroad Commission to break apart a unit and suspend operations therein. Reeder claims that the exculpatory clause in Article V.A of the JOA absolves him of liability. At trial, a jury finds that Reeder breached his duty to the non-operators by failing to maintain production in paying quantities. The court of appeals affirms, and holds that the exculpatory clause in the JOA at issue should not apply to shield the operator from the claims of the non-operators as it did not apply to breach of contract claims like the ones at issue. Reeder v. Wood County Energy, LLC, 320 S.W3d 433, 173 0.&G.R.
机译:Wendell Reeder是根据1989年AAPL表格610表联合经营协议(JOA)的条款,在得克萨斯州伍德县的Forest Hill油田从事油气租赁的经营者。执行JOA后,里德(Reeder)面临非运营商的诉求,称他未能维持按需支付的生产量,导致可能价值数百万美元的租赁到期,得克萨斯州铁路委员会(Texas Railroad Commission)拆分了一个机组并暂停了该机组的运营。里德(Reeder)声称,《 JOA》第V.A条中的免责条款免除了他的责任。在审判中,陪审团裁定,里德(Reeder)因未能保持有偿生产而违反了对非经营者的责任。上诉法院申明并裁定,有争议的JOA中的免责条款不应适用于保护运营商免受非运营商的要求,因为它不适用于有争议的违反合同的要求。 Reeder诉伍德县能源有限责任公司,320 S.W3d 433,173 0。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号