首页> 外文学位 >Risk management in the contractual language in the construction industry: The effect of exculpatory clauses on contractor bid price.
【24h】

Risk management in the contractual language in the construction industry: The effect of exculpatory clauses on contractor bid price.

机译:建筑行业合同语言的风险管理:免责条款对承包商投标价格的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Exculpatory clauses are often used in construction contracts to shift potential risks of construction from one party to another. Hartman (1998) suggests that Canadian contractors use a risk premium between 9% and 19% as part of their contingency plan to alleviate the risks associated with accepting exculpatory clauses. This study was conducted to identify and quantify risk premiums U.S. contractors use to mitigate the risk associated with accepting five exculpatory clauses. These clauses allocate risk for: design errors, differing site conditions, construction errors, risks of payments, no damage for delays. The study also examined the correlation among the contractor's years of experience, company size and percent of self completed work and the contractor's risk premium for each identified risk. Seven research questions were developed for this study. The study compared the bid prices obtained from two groups of contractors/estimators (group A and group B), with different bid packages for the same project. While results of this study indicated that there was no statistically significant difference between bid prices obtained from group A and group B contractors. The results did indicate that there was a reduction in the bid amount of 23% between group A contractors' lump sum prices and group B contractors' lump sum prices. Based on the reported results, an alternative approach was recommended with the goal of reducing project costs. Also, recommendations were made to owners to better control for the identified risks.
机译:在建筑合同中经常使用免责条款将建筑的潜在风险从一方转移到另一方。 Hartman(1998)建议加拿大承包商在其应急计划中使用9%至19%的风险溢价,以减轻与接受免责条款相关的风险。进行这项研究是为了确定和量化美国承包商为减轻与接受五项免责条款相关的风险而使用的风险溢价。这些条款将风险分配给:设计错误,不同的工地条件,施工错误,付款风险,延误没有损坏。该研究还检查了承包商的经验年限,公司规模和自我完成工作的百分比以及每种已识别风险的承包商风险溢价之间的相关性。为此研究提出了七个研究问题。该研究比较了从两组承包商/估算员(A组和B组)获得的投标价格,以及同一项目的不同投标方案。虽然这项研究的结果表明,从A组和B组承包商获得的投标价格之间没有统计学上的显着差异。结果确实表明,A组承包商的一次性价格和B组承包商的一次性价格之间的投标额减少了23%。根据报告的结果,推荐了一种替代方法,目的是降低项目成本。此外,还向业主提出了建议,以更好地控制已识别的风险。

著录项

  • 作者

    Haddad, Bashar.;

  • 作者单位

    Indiana State University.;

  • 授予单位 Indiana State University.;
  • 学科 Engineering Civil.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 179 p.
  • 总页数 179
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 建筑科学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号