首页> 外文期刊>Oikos: A Journal of Ecology >To resprout or not to resprout: factors driving intraspecific variability in resprouting.
【24h】

To resprout or not to resprout: factors driving intraspecific variability in resprouting.

机译:重发或不重发:驱动发芽中种内变异性的因素。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Resprouting is a mechanism that allows individual plants to persist in disturbance-prone ecosystems. It is often considered a binary trait, defining species as resprouters or non-resprouters. Although this dichotomous classification accounts for a high proportion of the interspecific variability in resprouting, it does not account for the intraspecific variability, as not all individuals of resprouting species successfully resprout, even if they are subject to a similar disturbance. To ascertain the causes of the intraspecific variability in resprouting we propose a conceptual model that disaggregates the process of resprouting into three sequential steps: initial ability to resprout, resprouting vigour and post-resprouting survival. To test this model, we clipped 151 plants of three resprouting species ( Anthyllis cytisoides, Globularia alypum and Linum suffruticosum) and, for each individual, we analysed the carbohydrate (starch and soluble sugars) and nutrient (N and P) concentrations in the roots at the moment of the disturbance (clipping all aboveground biomass). We then monitored initial ability to resprout, resprouting vigour and post-resprouting survival in each individual during a one-year period. Anthyllis showed high initial ability to resprout and high post-resprouting survival. Globularia and Linum had low final resprouting success, mainly due to their low post-resprouting survival, but also to the low initial ability to resprout in Linum. All three species showed variable resprouting vigour. Our results suggest that resprouting success is limited by different phases of the process of resprouting, depending on the species. Intraspecific variability in resprouting supported the importance of: (a) the pre-disturbance state of the plant (i.e. plant size and stored resources) on the initial ability to resprout and on the resprouting vigour, and (b) the initial post-disturbance capacity to acquire resources (i.e. resprouting vigour) on the post-resprouting survival. The proposed three-step model of resprouting provides a mechanistic description of the factors driving intraspecific variability in resprouting.
机译:重新萌发是一种机制,可使单个植物在易受干扰的生态系统中生存。它通常被认为是二元性状,将物种定义为繁殖者或非繁殖者。尽管这种二分分类法在再发芽过程中占种间变异性的很大一部分,但它并不能解释种内变异性,因为即使所有遭受再发芽的物种个体都遭受类似的干扰,也并非所有个体都能成功地发芽。为了确定重发芽中种内变异性的原因,我们提出了一个概念模型,该模型将重发芽的过程分为三个连续步骤:初始发芽能力,重发芽活力和重发后存活。为了测试该模型,我们修剪了三种重生树种的151种植物(Anthyllis cytisoides,Agloparia alypum和Linum suffruticosum),并针对每个个体分析了根中的碳水化合物(淀粉和可溶性糖)以及营养素(N和P)的浓度在发生干扰时(将所有地上生物量剪掉)。然后,我们监测了一年中每个个体的初始萌发,萌发活力和萌发后生存能力。蒽甲显示出较高的初始萌发能力和较高的发芽后存活率。 globularia和Linum的最终重发成功率较低,这主要是由于它们的重发后存活率较低,而且还由于Linum的初始重发能力较低。这三个物种都显示出不同的再生活力。我们的结果表明,取决于物种,重发成功受到重发过程不同阶段的限制。重发中的种内变异性支持以下重要性:(a)植物的扰动前状态(即植物大小和存储的资源)对初始发芽能力和发芽活力的影响,以及(b)初始扰动后能力获得有关发芽后生存的资源(即发芽活力)。拟议的三步重发模型提供了机制描述重发中种内变异性的驱动因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号