首页> 外文期刊>Oikos: A Journal of Ecology >Trophic interception: how a boundary-foraging organism influences cross-ecosystem fluxes
【24h】

Trophic interception: how a boundary-foraging organism influences cross-ecosystem fluxes

机译:营养拦截:觅食生物如何影响跨生态系统通量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The rate at which subsidies move between habitats is a function not only of those factors that facilitate such transfers, but also of factors that limit or restrict the movement of subsidies. The interruption or redirection of subsidies by organisms foraging at the boundary between habitats, or trophic interception, has the potential to substantially restructure the food webs of recipient habitats. In this study we describe how a waterstrider, Aquarius remigis, limits the transfer of a subsidy across the land-water boundary. Prey interception varied with the type of stream habitat; on average, waterstriders in isolated pools intercepted 71.8% of experimental prey inputs of all sizes compared with 21.5% in connected pools and 0.8% in riffles. Across all stream habitat types, waterstriders consumed 43.2% of the experimental inputs of the smallest prey used, the prey size class most similar to natural inputs in our study area. We estimate that foraging waterstriders may intercept 0.3-1.2 kg of terrestrial prey subsidy for every 100 m of stream channel during three summer months, resources that could otherwise support 13-58 young-of-the-year salmonids. In controlled trials, waterstriders significantly altered the amount of terrestrial prey directly consumed by fish, while fish also altered waterstrider interception of those prey. Interestingly, when waterstriders and fish were present together, more terrestrial prey were lost to the streambed than when either or both of these consumers were absent, making this resource available to benthic detritivores, and facilitating the direct incorporation of terrestrial nutrients into stream detrital webs. Overall, we demonstrate that organisms that forage at habitat boundaries can control the quantity and quality of subsidies arriving in recipient habitats, potentially altering food web structures within those habitats.
机译:补贴在生境之间转移的速度不仅取决于促进此类转移的因素,而且还取决于限制或限制补贴转移的因素。在生境之间觅食的生物中断或重新定向补贴,或进行营养滋补,有可能实质性地改变受赠生境的食物网。在这项研究中,我们描述了水str水瓶座(Aquarius remigis)如何限制补贴跨陆水边界的转移。猎物的截获随溪流栖息地的类型而变化。平均而言,隔离池中的注水器拦截了各种规模的实验性猎物输入的71.8%,相比之下,连通池中为21.5%,浅滩为0.8%。在所有河流生境类型中,水tri消耗的实验性投入占所使用的最小猎物的43.2%,猎物大小等级与我们研究区域的自然投入最为相似。我们估计,在夏季的三个月中,觅食性水s可能会为每100 m的河道拦截0.3-1.2 kg的陆地猎物补贴,否则这些资源可能会支持13-58岁的年幼鲑鱼。在对照试验中,注水者显着改变了鱼类直接消耗的陆地猎物的数量,而鱼类也改变了注水者对这些猎物的注水行为。有趣的是,与水消食者和鱼类一起出现时,与没有水消食者或鱼类消亡者在一起时,河床流失的陆生猎物更多,这使底栖碎屑动物可以利用该资源,并有利于将陆生营养物直接掺入河流碎屑网中。总体而言,我们证明了在栖息地边界觅食的生物可以控制到达受赠者栖息地的补贴的数量和质量,从而潜在地改变这些栖息地内的食物网结构。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号