...
首页> 外文期刊>Oikos: A Journal of Ecology >The effects of habitat manipulation on population distribution and foraging behavior in meadow voles
【24h】

The effects of habitat manipulation on population distribution and foraging behavior in meadow voles

机译:栖息地操纵对草地田鼠种群分布和觅食行为的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Individuals, free to choose between different habitat patches, should settle among them such that fitness is equalized. Alternatives to this ideal free distribution result into fitness differences among the patches. The concordance between fitnesses and foraging costs among inhabitants of different quality patches, demonstrated in recent studies, suggests that the mode of habitat selection and the resulting fitness patterns may have important implications to the resource use of a forager and to the survival of its prey. We studied how coarse scale selection between habitat patches of different quality and quitting harvest rate in these patches are related to each other and to fine scale patch use in meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus). To demonstrate these relationships, we manipulated habitat patches within large field enclosures by mowing vegetative cover and adding supplemental food according to a 2 x 2 factorial design. We tracked vole population densities, collected giving-up densities (GUDs, a measure of patch quitting harvest rate), and monitored the removal of seeds from lattice grids with 1.5 m intervals (an index of fine-scale space use) in the manipulated habitat patches. Changes in habitat quality induced changes in habitat use at different spatial scales. In preferred habitats with intact cover, voles were despotic and GUDs were low, but increased with the addition of food. In contrast, voles in less-preferred mowed habitats settled into an ideal free distribution, GUDs were high and uninfluenced by the addition of food. Seed removal was enhanced by the presence of cover but inhibited by supplemental food. Across all treatments, vole densities and GUDs were strongly correlated making it impossible to separate their effects on seed removal rates. However, this relationship broke down in unmowed habitats, where GUDs rather than vole density primarily influenced seed removal by voles. GUDs and seed removal correlated with predation on tree seedlings formerly planted into the enclosures, demonstrating the mechanisms between coarse-scale habitat manipulations and community level consequences on a forager's prey.
机译:可以在不同栖息地之间自由选择的个人应在其中安顿下来,以使适应度均等。理想的免费分发的替代方法会导致补丁之间的适应性差异。最近的研究表明,不同质量斑块居民的适应度和觅食成本之间的一致性表明,生境的选择模式和所产生的适应度模式可能对觅食者的资源利用及其猎物的生存产生重要影响。我们研究了不同质量的生境斑块之间的粗尺度选择和这些斑块中的收获率之间如何相互关联,以及与草甸田鼠(田鼠(Microtus pennsylvanicus))的小规模斑块使用之间如何相关。为了证明这些关系,我们根据2 x 2析因设计,通过修剪植物覆盖物并添加补充食物,在大田地围栏内操纵栖息地。我们跟踪了田鼠的种群密度,收集了放弃的密度(GUD,一种衡量斑块退出收获率的方法),并在受控栖息地中以1.5 m的间隔(精细空间利用指数)监测了晶格中种子的去除情况补丁。栖息地质量的变化引起了不同空间尺度上栖息地使用的变化。在具有完好无损的首选栖息地中,田鼠专制,而GUD较低,但是随着食物的添加而增加。相反,在偏爱的割草生境中的田鼠定居为理想的自由分布,GUD较高,不受添加食物的影响。覆盖的存在促进了种子的去除,但辅食抑制了种子的去除。在所有处理中,田鼠密度和GUD高度相关,因此无法分开它们对种子去除率的影响。但是,这种关系在没有割草的栖息地中破裂了,那里的GUD而不是田鼠密度主要影响田鼠对种子的去除。 GUD和种子的清除与以前种植在围墙中的树木幼苗的捕食有关,这说明了粗尺度的栖息地操纵与觅食者猎物的社区影响之间的机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号