...
首页> 外文期刊>Oecologia >Does morphology predict trophic position and habitat use of ant species and assemblages?
【24h】

Does morphology predict trophic position and habitat use of ant species and assemblages?

机译:形态学是否可以预测蚂蚁物种和组合的营养位置和栖息地使用情况?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A functional traits-based theory of organismal communities is critical for understanding the principles underlying community assembly, and predicting responses to environmental change. This is particularly true for terrestrial arthropods, of which only 20 % are described. Using epigaeic ant assemblages, we asked: (1) can we use morphological variation among species to predict trophic position or preferred microhabitat; (2) does the strength of morphological associations suggest recent trait divergence; (3) do environmental variables at site scale predict trait sets for whole assemblages? We pitfall-trapped ants from a revegetation chronosequence and measured their morphology, trophic position [using C:N stoichiometry and stable isotope ratios (delta)] and characteristics of microhabitat and macrohabitat. We found strong associations between high trophic position (low C:N and high delta N-15) in body tissue and morphological traits: predators were larger, had more laterally positioned eyes, more physical protection and tended to be monomorphic. In addition, morphological traits were associated with certain microhabitat features, e.g. smaller heads were associated with the bare ground microhabitat. Trait-microhabitat relationships were more pronounced when phylogenetic adjustments were used, indicating a strong influence of recent trait divergences. At the assemblage level, our fourth corner analysis revealed associations between the prevalence of traits and macrohabitat, although these associations were not the same as those based on microhabitat associations. This study shows direct links between species-level traits and both diet and habitat preference. Trait-based prediction of ecological roles and community structure is thus achievable when integrating stoichiometry, morphology and phylogeny, but scale is an important consideration in such predictions.
机译:基于功能性特征的生物群落理论对于理解群落基础的原理以及预测对环境变化的响应至关重要。对于陆生节肢动物尤其如此,其中仅描述了20%。通过使用蚁群,我们问:(1)我们可以利用物种间的形态变化来预测营养位置或首选的微生境吗? (2)形态学关联的强度是否暗示了最近的性状差异; (3)场地规模的环境变量是否可以预测整个组合的性状集?我们从一个植被重新排列的序列中陷入陷阱,并测量了它们的形态,营养位置(使用C:N化学计量和稳定的同位素比(δ))以及微生境和大生境的特征。我们发现人体组织中较高的营养位置(较低的C:N和较高的N-15含量)与形态特征之间有很强的联系:捕食者更大,眼睛更侧向定位,更多的身体保护并倾向于单态。另外,形态特征与某些微生境特征有关,例如较小的头与裸露的微生境有关。当使用系统发育调整时,性状-微栖息地的关系更加明显,表明最近性状差异的强烈影响。在集合层次上,我们的第四个角分析揭示了性状的流行与宏观栖息地之间的关联,尽管这些关联与基于微观栖息地关联的关联不同。这项研究显示了物种水平特征与饮食和栖息地偏好之间的直接联系。因此,在整合化学计量,形态和系统发育方面,可以基于特征进行生态作用和群落结构的预测,但是规模是此类预测中的重要考虑因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号