首页> 外文期刊>Oecologia >Benefits and costs to pollinating, seed-eating insects: the effect of flower size and fruit abortion on larval performance.
【24h】

Benefits and costs to pollinating, seed-eating insects: the effect of flower size and fruit abortion on larval performance.

机译:授粉,以种子为食的昆虫的收益和成本:花大小和果实流产对幼虫性能的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Plant-pollinator interactions are well-known examples of mutualism, but are not free of antagonism. Antagonistic interactions and defenses or counter-defenses are expected particularly in nursery pollination. In these systems, adult insects, while pollinating, lay their eggs in flowers, and juveniles consume the seeds from one or several fruits, thereby substantially reducing plant fitness. The outcome of such interactions will depend, for the plant, on the balance between pollination versus seed predation and for the larvae on the balance between the food and shelter provided versus the costs imposed by plant defenses, e.g., through abortion of infested fruits. Here, we examine the costs and benefits to the larvae in the nursery-pollination system Silene latifolia/Hadena bicruris. Using selection lines that varied in flower size (large- vs. small-flowered plants), we investigated the effects of variation in flower and fruit size and of a potential defense, fruit abortion, on larval performance. In this system, infested fruits are significantly more likely to be aborted than non-infested fruits; however, it is unclear whether fruit abortion is effective as a defense. Larger flowers gave rise to larger fruits with more seeds, and larvae that were heavier at emergence. Fruit abortion was frequently observed (ca. 40% of the infested fruits). From aborted fruits, larvae emerged earlier and were substantially lighter than larvae emerging from non-aborted fruits. The lower mass at emergence of larvae from aborted fruits indicates that abortion is a resistance mechanism. Assuming that lower larval mass implies fewer resources invested in the frugivore, these results also suggest that abortion is likely to benefit the plant as a defense mechanism, by limiting both resources invested in attacked fruits, as well as the risk of secondary attack. This suggests that selective fruit abortion may contribute to the stability of mutualism also in this non-obligate system.
机译:植物-授粉媒介的相互作用是众所周知的互惠的例子,但并非没有拮抗作用。尤其是在苗圃授粉中,预计会发生敌对互动和防御或反击。在这些系统中,成虫在授粉时将卵产在花朵上,而幼虫则从一种或几种果实中消耗种子,从而大大降低了植物的适应性。这种相互作用的结果,对于植物而言,将取决于授粉与种子捕食之间的平衡,而幼虫则取决于所提供的食物和庇护所之间的平衡,以及取决于植物防御(例如,通过侵染被侵染的水果)带来的成本。在这里,我们研究了在育苗授粉系统中的幼虫的成本和收益 Silene latifolia / Hadena bicruris 。我们使用了花朵大小不同的选择系(大花朵植物与小花朵植物),我们调查了花朵和果实大小的变化以及潜在防御力(水果流产)对幼虫性能的影响。在这个系统中,受感染的水果比未受感染的水果被堕胎的可能性要大得多。但是,目前尚不清楚人工流产是否可以有效地起到防御作用。较大的花朵产生较大的果实,带有更多的种子,幼虫在出苗时较重。经常观察到水果流产(约占受感染水果的40%)。从流产的果实中,幼虫出现较早,并且比未流产的果实中幼虫轻得多。来自流产果实的幼虫出现的质量较低表明流产是一种耐药机制。假定较低的幼虫质量意味着在食肉动物上投入的资源较少,这些结果还表明,流产可能会通过限制在被侵袭果实上的投入资源和二次侵袭的风险来使植物作为防御机制受益。这表明在这种非专性的系统中,有选择地流产也可能有助于稳定共存。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号