首页> 外文期刊>Oncology: International Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment >Hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy versus conventional fractionation both combined with chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced head and neck carcinomas: a retrospective analysis of a monoinstitutional series.
【24h】

Hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy versus conventional fractionation both combined with chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced head and neck carcinomas: a retrospective analysis of a monoinstitutional series.

机译:局部晚期头颈癌患者的超分割加速放疗与常规分割联合化疗的比较:单机构系列的回顾性分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (HART) has been combined with chemotherapy (CC) for locally advanced head and neck cancer, but no data from randomized trials are available for a comparison with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) and CC. METHODS: This monoinstitutional retrospective study compares the results of both treatment schedules: 315 patients with locally advanced carcinoma (UICC stage III and IV) of the oral cavity and the orohypopharynx were treated from January 1990 to March 2006 with a radiochemotherapy combination based on mitomycin C and fluorouracil (HART-CC: 203 patients, CFRT-CC: 112 patients, total dose: 70-72 Gy) with curative intent. RESULTS: Two- and 4-year survival was 60 and 42 (HART-CC) and 59 and 42% (CFRT-CC; p = 0.82, log-rank test), respectively. Using multivariate Cox regression, pretreatment hemoglobin level, N stage, tumor site but not the year of treatment, gender and T stage were significant prognosticators for survival. For locoregional control, only N stage was significant. The prognostic value of these pretreatment factors did not variate with the fractionation schedule used. CONCLUSIONS: In combination with CC, there was no trend towards an improved efficacy of HART in comparison with CFRT.
机译:目的:超分割加速放疗(HART)与化学疗法(CC)结合用于局部晚期头颈癌,但尚无来自随机试验的数据可与常规分割放疗(CFRT)和CC进行比较。方法:这项单一机构的回顾性研究比较了两种治疗方案的结果:1990年1月至2006年3月,采用基于丝裂霉素C的放化疗联合治疗了315例局部晚期口腔癌(UICC III期和IV期)和口咽咽癌患者和氟尿嘧啶(HART-CC:203例,CFRT-CC:112例,总剂量:70-72 Gy)且具有治愈意图。结果:两年和四年生存率分别为60和42(HART-CC)和59和42%(CFRT-CC; p = 0.82,对数秩检验)。使用多元Cox回归,治疗前的血红蛋白水平,N期,肿瘤部位而非治疗年份,性别和T期是生存的重要预后因素。对于局部区域控制,仅N期显着。这些预处理因素的预后价值不会随所使用的分级方案而变化。结论:与CC联合使用,与CFRT相比,HART疗效没有改善的趋势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号