首页> 外文期刊>Oncology: International Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment >Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of First-Line Chemotherapies in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Results of the Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive (FFCD) 9601 Randomized Trial
【24h】

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of First-Line Chemotherapies in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Results of the Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive (FFCD) 9601 Randomized Trial

机译:联邦大肠癌消化法(FFCD)9601随机试验对转移性结直肠癌一线化疗的成本效果分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The De Gramont regimen (or high-dose LV5FU2, HD-LV5FU2) is considered a standard treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and the costs of three regimens as compared to HD-LV5FU2: raltitrexed (R), LV5FU2 with a lower dose of folinic acid (LD-LV5FU2), and weekly infusional 5FU (WI-FU). Methods: An economic analysis was performed prospectively as part of a randomized trial comparing first-line chemotherapy regimens in 294 patients with unresect-able metastatic colorectal cancer. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). Direct medical costs were computed from the health system viewpoint using 2001 unit costs. Results: None of the three regimens improved EFS as compared to HD-LV5FU2. R was less effective and more toxic. The mean total cost per patient was ? 15,970 for HD-LV5FU2. The cost of R (? 10,687) was lower than that of HD-LV5FU2 (p = 0.008). The cost of LD-LV5FU2 (? 14,888) and of WI-FU (? 13,760) was not significantly different from that of HD-LV5FU2. Conclusion: The lower efficacy and increased toxic-ity of R made it a clinically inferior regimen despite its easy administration and lower cost. The HD-LV5FU2 protocol remains a better treatment. LD-LV5FU2 appeared a good alternative regimen because it reduced costs without jeopardizing its efficacy. The WI-FU regimen did not show a significant difference in terms of efficacy, but suggested toxicity to be Slightly increased.
机译:背景:De Gramont疗法(或大剂量LV5FU2,HD-LV5FU2)被认为是转移性结直肠癌的标准治疗方法。这项研究的目的是评估三种方案与HD-LV5FU2的疗效和成本:拉替曲定(R),低剂量亚叶酸的LV5FU2(LD-LV5FU2)和每周输注5FU(WI-FU) )。方法:前瞻性分析是一项随机试验的一部分,比较了294例无法切除的转移性结直肠癌患者的一线化疗方案。主要终点是无事件生存期(EFS)。从医疗系统的角度使用2001年单位成本计算直接医疗费用。结果:与HD-LV5FU2相比,三种方案均未改善EFS。 R不太有效,毒性更大。每位患者的平均总费用为? HD-LV5FU2为15,970。 R的成本(?10,687)低于HD-LV5FU2(p = 0.008)。 LD-LV5FU2(?14,888)和WI-FU(?13,760)的成本与HD-LV5FU2的成本没有显着差异。结论:尽管R易于管理且成本较低,但R的较低疗效和更高的毒性使其在临床上不合格。 HD-LV5FU2协议仍然是一种更好的方法。 LD-LV5FU2似乎是一种很好的替代方案,因为它可以降低成本而又不损害其功效。 WI-FU方案在功效方面未显示出显着差异,但提示毒性会略有增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号