...
首页> 外文期刊>Obstetrics and Gynecology: Journal of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists >Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term.
【24h】

Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term.

机译:为提高妇女在足月或以后的分娩结果而引产。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: As a pregnancy continues beyond term the risks of babies dying inside the womb or in the immediate newborn period increase. Whether a policy of labour induction at a predetermined gestational age can reduce this increased risk is the subject of this review. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits and harms of a policy of labour induction at term or postterm compared to awaiting spontaneous labour or later induction of labour. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (June 2006). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials conducted in women at or beyond term. The eligible trials were those comparing a policy of labour induction to a policy of awaiting spontaneous onset of labour. Trials comparing cervical ripening methods, membrane stripping/sweeping or nipple stimulation without any commitment to delivery within a certain time were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently evaluated potentially eligible trials and extracted data. Outcomes are analyzed in two main categories: gestational age and cervix status. MAIN RESULTS: We included 19 trials reporting on 7,984 women. A policy of labour induction at 41 completed weeks or beyond was associated with fewer (all-cause) perinatal deaths (1/2986 versus 9/2953; relative risk [RR] 0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09 to 0.99). The risk difference is 0.00 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.00). If deaths due to congenital abnormality are excluded, no deaths remain in the labour induction group and seven deaths remain in the no-induction group. There was no evidence of a statistically significant difference in the risk of caesarean section (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.76 to 1.12; RR 0.97; 95% CI 0.72 to 1.31) for women induced at 41 and 42 completed weeks, respectively. Women induced at 37 to 40 completed weeks were more likely to have a caesarean section with expectant management than those in the labour induction group (RR 0.58; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.99). There were fewer babies with meconiumaspiration syndrome (41+: RR 0.29; 95% CI 0.12 to 0.68, four trials, 1,325 women; 42+: RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.24 to 1.81, two trials, 388 women). AUTHORS' CONCLUSION: A policy of labour induction after 41 completed weeks or later compared to awaiting spontaneous labour either indefinitely or at least one week is associated with fewer perinatal deaths. However, the absolute risk is extremely small. Women should be appropriately counseled on both the relative and absolute risks.
机译:背景:随着妊娠期的延长,婴儿在子宫内或刚出生的婴儿中死亡的风险增加。这项审查的主题是在预定胎龄时引产的政策是否可以减少这种增加的风险。目的:评估与自然劳动或以后引产相比,足月或产后引产政策的利弊。搜索策略:我们搜索了Cochrane妊娠和分娩组的试验登记册(2006年6月)。选择标准:在足月或以后对女性进行的随机对照试验。符合条件的试验是将引产政策与等待自然分娩的政策进行比较的试验。没有比较宫颈成熟方法,膜剥离/清扫或乳头刺激的试验,但没有承诺在一定时间内进行分娩。数据收集和分析:两位评价作者独立评估了潜在合格的试验并提取了数据。结果分为两个主要类别:胎龄和子宫颈状态。主要结果:我们纳入了19项试验,报告了7,984名妇女。在41个完整星期或更长的时间内引产的政策与较少(全因)围产期死亡相关(1/2986对9/2953;相对风险[RR] 0.30; 95%置信区间[CI] 0.09至0.99)。风险差异为0.00(95%CI 0.01至0.00)。如果排除由于先天性异常导致的死亡,引产组中没有死亡,无引诱组中有7例死亡。没有证据表明,分别在第41周和第42周完成的女性中,剖腹产的风险有统计学差异(RR 0.92; 95%CI 0.76至1.12; RR 0.97; 95%CI 0.72至1.31)。与引产组相比,在完成37至40周的妊娠后进行预期剖腹产的妇女更有可能进行剖腹产(RR 0.58; 95%CI 0.34至0.99)。胎粪吸入综合征的婴儿较少(41名:RR 0.29; 95%CI 0.12至0.68,四项试验,1,325名女性; 42+:RR,0.66; 95%CI 0.24至1.81,两项试验,388名女性)。作者的结论:与无限期或至少一个星期等待自发分娩相比,在41个整周或之后完成引产的政策与围产期死亡的减少相关。但是,绝对风险非常小。应该就相对和绝对风险向妇女提供适当的咨询。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号