...
首页> 外文期刊>Obstetrics and Gynecology: Journal of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists >Incontinence Outcomes in Women Undergoing Primary and Repeat Midurethral Sling Procedures
【24h】

Incontinence Outcomes in Women Undergoing Primary and Repeat Midurethral Sling Procedures

机译:进行初次和多次尿道穿带吊带术的妇女的尿失禁结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We read the recently published study by Par den et al. Because of the study design (mailed questionnaires), the authors could not perform an objective assessment of urinary leakage (negative cough test with a full bladder). The authors denned "cure" on the basis of the answer to two questions of the Urinary Distress Inventory-6; this can be considered a subjective assessment of cure. However, most of the recent studies considered subjective success as an answer of "very much improved or much improved" on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement Questionnaire, which was completed by study patients. It should be pointed out that the improvement in the Patient Global Impression of Improvement scores after surgery was similar between the two study groups. Furthermore, a specific assessment of stress urinary incontinence symptoms was performed using the Medical Epidemiologic and Social Aspects of Aging questionnaire stress subset scores, and, after treatment, no difference in its results was observed between the study groups.
机译:我们阅读了Par den等人最近发表的研究。由于研究设计(邮寄问卷),作者无法对尿漏进行客观评估(对充满膀胱的阴性咳嗽试验)。作者根据对“尿痛清单” -6的两个问题的回答来否认“治愈”。这可以被认为是治愈的主观评估。但是,最近的大多数研究都将主观成功视为对患者整体改善印象调查表的“大大改善或大大改善”的答案,该问卷由研究患者完成。应该指出的是,两个研究组的患者术后整体改善印象得分的改善相似。此外,使用《医学流行病学和衰老的社会方面》问卷对压力尿失禁症状进行了专门评估,并评估了压力子集评分,在治疗后,研究组之间未观察到结果差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号