...
首页> 外文期刊>Obstetrics and Gynecology: Journal of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists >Effect of rotation on perineal lacerations in forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries
【24h】

Effect of rotation on perineal lacerations in forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries

机译:旋转对镊子辅助阴道分娩会阴撕裂伤的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE:: To determine the difference in the rates of severe perineal lacerations between forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries in the occiput-posterior position compared with forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries in which the fetal head was rotated to occiput-anterior before delivery. METHODS:: We studied a retrospective cohort of 148 women who had a forceps-assisted vaginal delivery from 2008 to 2011 at the University of Pittsburgh. Mild perineal lacerations were defined as first or second degree, and severe lacerations were defined as third or fourth degree. χ and t tests were used for bivariate and logistic regression was used for multivariable analyses. P<.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS:: Of 148 forceps-assisted deliveries, 81 delivered occiput-anterior after either manual or forceps rotation, 10 delivered in the occiput-posterior or occiput-transverse position after an unsuccessful rotation, and 57 delivered occiput-posterior without attempted rotation. No significant differences were found among demographic, obstetric, and neonatal characteristics of the groups. Overall, 86 (67.7%) women had mild lacerations and 41 (32.3%) had severe lacerations. A significantly greater rate of severe perineal lacerations was found in the occiput-posterior nonrotated compared with the rotated group (43.4% compared with 24.3%; P=.02). In multivariable analyses, adjusted for age, race, insurance, body mass index, gestational age, parity, episiotomy, and birth weight, forceps-assisted vaginal delivery in the occiput-posterior position without rotation remained significantly more likely to be associated with severe lacerations (odds ratio 3.67, 95% confidence interval 1.42-9.47). CONCLUSION:: Forceps-assisted vaginal delivery after rotation of an occiput-posterior position to an occiput-anterior position is associated with less severe maternal perineal trauma than forceps-assisted delivery in the occiput-posterior position.
机译:目的:确定与后分娩时胎儿头旋转至枕前的钳子阴道分娩相比,在枕后位置的钳子辅助阴道分娩之间严重会阴撕裂发生率的差异。方法:我们回顾了2008年至2011年在匹兹堡大学对148例行镊子辅助阴道分娩的妇女的回顾性研究。轻度会阴撕裂伤定义为一级或二级,严重的会阴撕裂伤定义为第三级或第四级。 χ和t检验用于双变量,对数回归用于多变量分析。 P <.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:在148例钳子辅助分娩中,有81例在手动或镊子旋转后向后枕骨交付,有10例在旋转失败后以枕骨后位或枕骨横位交付,有57例未经尝试旋转而枕骨后分娩。两组的人口统计学,产科和新生儿特征之间无显着差异。总体而言,有86位(67.7%)妇女有轻度撕裂伤,有41位(32.3%)有严重的撕裂伤。与旋转组相比,未旋转后枕后部发生严重的会阴撕裂伤的比率明显更高(43.4%比24.3%; P = .02)。在对年龄,种族,保险,体重指数,胎龄,胎次,会阴切开术和出生体重进行调整的多变量分析中,在没有旋转的情况下,在枕骨后部位置阴道钳辅助阴道分娩的可能性仍然更大,与严重撕裂伤相关(赔率3.67,95%置信区间1.42-9.47)。结论:枕后位置旋转到枕前位置后,由镊子辅助的阴道分娩比than枕后位置的钳子辅助分娩与严重的产妇会阴创伤相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号