...
首页> 外文期刊>Obstetrical and gynecological survey >Number of Cervical Examinations and Risk of Intrapartum Maternal Fever
【24h】

Number of Cervical Examinations and Risk of Intrapartum Maternal Fever

机译:子宫颈检查数量和产时产妇发烧风险

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Most obstetricians believe that multiple cervical examinations during labor may increase the risk of intra-amniotic infection and fever. There is very little evidence to support this perception. Because available studies have not used time-dependent analyses to estimate the risk between increasing number of cervical examinations and fever, it is unknown whether the risk factor for a specific febrile patient is the length of labor, the number of examinations, both, or neither.This retrospective cohort study was designed to estimate the risk of increasing numbers of cervical examinations with maternal fever in labor and delivery. Time-dependent analysis was used to investigate whether changes in the length of labor and length of membrane rupture were risk factors for infection. The study was conducted over 4 years at a university medical center. Participants were 2395 women with singleton term pregnancies (>37 weeks of gestation) who reached the second stage of labor and were afebrile on admission. Women who developed an intrapartum fever were compared with women who were afebrile through 6 hours postpartum. The primary study outcome measure was maternal fever. Extensive labor and delivery data were obtained from medical records, including obstetric and medical history, admitting diagnoses, number and timing of cervical examinations, and neonatal and maternal birth outcomes. Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess risk of fever, adjusting for potentially confounding factors. Cervical examinations were performed 1 to 14 times.Of the 2395 women afebrile at admission, 174 (7.2%) developed an intrapartum fever. A greater number of examinations was not associated with increased risk of fever. There was no significant difference in the risk of fever between women who had 1 to 3 cervical examinations and those with 7 or more examinations; the hazard ratio was 0.9, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.4 to 2.0. Stratification of the data by labor type did not show a significant association between the number of cervical examinations and risk of fever. Moreover, the number of cervical examinations performed after rupture of membranes was not associated with a statistically significant increased risk.These findings show that the number of cervical examinations performed in pregnant women during term labor management is not an independent risk factor for maternal fever during the second stage of labor.
机译:大多数产科医生认为,分娩时进行多次宫颈检查可能会增加羊膜内感染和发烧的风险。很少有证据支持这种看法。由于现有研究尚未使用时间依赖性分析来估计子宫颈检查数量增加与发烧之间的风险,因此尚不清楚特定高热患者的危险因素是分娩时长,检查次数,或两者兼而有之这项回顾性队列研究旨在评估在产程和分娩中伴有产妇发烧的子宫颈检查数量增加的风险。使用时间依赖性分析来调查劳动时间和膜破裂时间的变化是否是感染的危险因素。该研究在大学医学中心进行了4年以上。参加研究的是2395名单胎足月妊娠(妊娠> 37周)的妇女,她们已进入第二产程并入院时发热。将产后发烧的妇女与发热至产后6小时的妇女进行比较。主要研究结果指标是母亲发烧。从医疗记录中获得大量的分娩和分娩数据,包括产科和病史,入院诊断,子宫颈检查的次数和时机以及新生儿和产妇的分娩结果。使用Cox比例风险模型评估发烧风险,并调整潜在的混杂因素。子宫颈检查进行了1到14次,入院的2395例女性出现发热,其中174例(7.2%)出现了产时发烧。大量检查与发烧风险增加无关。接受过1-3次宫颈检查的女性和接受7次以上检查的女性的发烧风险没有显着差异。危险比为0.9,95%置信区间为0.4至2.0。按劳动类型划分的数据分层未显示宫颈检查次数与发烧风险之间有显着关联。此外,膜破裂后进行子宫颈检查的次数与统计学上显着的风险增加无关。这些发现表明,孕妇在足月分娩期间进行的子宫颈检查的次数并不是产妇在分娩期间发烧的独立危险因素。第二产程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号