...
首页> 外文期刊>Occupational and environmental medicine >Evaluation of the protective effectiveness of gloves from occupational exposure to 2-methoxyethanol using the biomarkers of 2-methoxyacetic acid levels in the urine and plasma.
【24h】

Evaluation of the protective effectiveness of gloves from occupational exposure to 2-methoxyethanol using the biomarkers of 2-methoxyacetic acid levels in the urine and plasma.

机译:使用尿液和血浆中2-甲氧基乙酸水平的生物标志物评估手套在职业性接触2-甲氧基乙醇中的防护效果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

AIMS: To evaluate the protective effectiveness of gloves from occupational exposure to 2-methoxyethanol (2-ME); and to examine the association of 2-methoxyacetic acid (MAA) in urine and plasma collected simultaneously from low 2-ME exposure and high 2-ME exposure workers in a semiconductor copper laminate circuit board manufacturing plant. METHODS: Eight hour time weighted breathing zone monitoring was performed to verify the 2-ME exposure classification between workers in regular and special operations. Urine and plasma samples were simultaneously collected from 74 exposed and 80 non-exposed workers. MAA concentrations in the urine (UMAA) and plasma (PMAA) were measured using previously published methods. Three types of gloves worn by workers (cotton, rubber, and no gloves) were recorded by direct observations in the workplace and validated by person-to-person interview. Protective effectiveness indices (PEI) were used to evaluate the glove effectiveness. RESULTS: There was no detectable 2-ME/MAA in the air, or in urine and plasma samples in non-exposed workers. The average UMAA and PMAA in special operations were 72.63 mg/g Cr. and 29.72 mg/l, significantly higher than values in regular operations (5.44 mg/g Cr. and 2.58 mg/l, respectively). PMAA showed satisfactory correlation to UMAA in all participants from both regular and special operations. The rubber gloves provided significant reduction in 2-ME uptake, whereas cotton gloves provided little protection with fluctuating effectiveness, based on PEI estimates. CONCLUSIONS: PMAA, similar to UMAA, could serve as a specific biomarker for 2-ME exposure. Wearing impermeable rubber gloves during high risk tasks can reduce major 2-ME exposure. Other improvements, including engineering control, should be provided to diminish worker exposure to 2-ME in occupational environments.
机译:目的:评估手套在职业上接触2-甲氧基乙醇(2-ME)的防护效果;并检查在半导体铜层压板制造厂从低2-ME暴露工人和高2-ME暴露工人同时收集的尿液和血浆中的2-甲氧基乙酸(MAA)的关联。方法:进行了八个小时的加权呼吸区监视,以验证常规和特殊操作工人之间的2-ME暴露分类。同时从74名暴露和80名未暴露的工人那里收集尿液和血浆样品。尿液(UMAA)和血浆(PMAA)中的MAA浓度是使用以前发表的方法测量的。通过在工作场所进行直接观察,记录了工人佩戴的三种类型的手套(棉,橡胶和无手套),并通过人与人的访谈进行了验证。防护效果指数(PEI)用于评估手套的有效性。结果:未接触空气的工人,尿液和血浆样品中均未检测到2-ME / MAA。特殊操作中的UMAA和PMAA平均含量为72.63 mg / g Cr。和29.72 mg / l,显着高于常规运行中的值(分别为5.44 mg / g铬和2.58 mg / l)。在常规和特殊行动的所有参与者中,PMAA与UMAA均显示出令人满意的相关性。根据PEI的估计,橡胶手套可显着减少2-ME的吸收,而棉手套几乎不提供保护,且波动效果很大。结论:PMAA与UMAA类似,可以作为2-ME暴露的特异性生物标志物。在高风险任务中戴不渗透的橡胶手套可以减少2-ME的大量暴露。应提供包括工程控制在内的其他改进措施,以减少工人在职业环境中接触2-ME的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号