首页> 外文期刊>Occupational and environmental medicine >Effectiveness of the hands-free technique in reducing operating theatre injuries.
【24h】

Effectiveness of the hands-free technique in reducing operating theatre injuries.

机译:免提技术在减少手术室伤害方面的有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Operating theatre personnel are at increased risk for transmission of blood borne pathogens when passing sharp instruments. The hands-free technique, whereby a tray or other means are used to eliminate simultaneous handling of sharp instruments, has been recommended. AIMS: To prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of the hands-free technique in reducing the incidence of percutaneous injuries, contaminations, and glove tears arising from handling sharp instruments. METHODS: For each of 3765 operations carried out in main and surgical day care operating theatres in a large urban hospital, over six months, circulating nurses recorded the proportion of use of the hands-free technique during each operation, as well as other features of the operation. The hands-free technique, considered to be used when 75% or more of the passes in an operation were done in this way, was used in 42% of operations. The relative rate of incidents (percutaneous injuries, contaminations, and glove tears) in operations where the hands-free technique was used and not used, with adjustment via multiple logistic regression for the different risk profiles of the two sets of operations, was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 143 incidents (40 percutaneous injuries, 51 contaminations, and 52 glove tears) were reported. In operations with greater than 100 ml blood loss, the incident rate was 4% (18/486) when the hands-free technique was used and 10% (90/880) when it was not, approximately 60% less. When adjusted for differences in type and duration of surgery, emergency status, noisiness, time of day, and number present for 75% of the operation, the reduction in the rate was 59% (95% CI 23% to 72%). In operations with less than 100 ml blood loss, the corresponding rates were 1.4% (15/1051) when the hands-free technique was used and 1.5% (19/1259) when it was not used. Adjustment for differences in risk factors did not alter the difference. CONCLUSIONS: Although not effective in all operations, use of the hands-free technique was effective in operations with more substantial blood loss.
机译:背景:手术室人员通过锋利的器械时,血液传播的病原体传播的风险增加。建议使用免提技术,该技术采用托盘或其他方式来避免同时处理锋利的乐器。目的:前瞻性评估免提技术在减少因使用锋利器械而引起的经皮受伤,污染和手套撕裂发生率方面的有效性。方法:对于大型城市医院的主要和外科日托手术室中进行的3765次手术中的每个手术,六个月以上,循环的护士记录了每次手术中使用免提技术的比例以及该手术的其他功能操作。以这种方式完成了75%或更多的通过次数的免提技术被用于42%的操作中。计算了使用和不使用免提技术的手术中的相对事件发生率(经皮受伤,污染和手套撕裂),并通过多对数回归对两组手术的不同风险状况进行了调整。结果:总共报告了143起事件(40次经皮损伤,51次污染和52次手套撕裂)。在失血量超过100毫升的手术中,使用免提技术时的发生率为4%(18/486),如果不使用免提技术,则为10%(90/880),减少了约60%。如果对手术类型和持续时间,紧急状态,嘈杂,一天中的时间以及出现手术的75%的人数进行差异调整,则该比率降低了59%(95%CI为23%至72%)。在失血少于100毫升的手术中,使用免提技术时的相应比率为1.4%(15/1051),不使用免提技术时的比率为1.5%(19/1259)。调整风险因素的差异并没有改变差异。结论:尽管并非在所有手术中均有效,但使用免提技术在失血更为严重的手术中仍有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号