...
首页> 外文期刊>Rheumatology international. >An open, randomized comparison study of cyclosporine A, cyclosporine A + methotrexate and cyclosporine A + hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of early severe rheumatoid arthritis.
【24h】

An open, randomized comparison study of cyclosporine A, cyclosporine A + methotrexate and cyclosporine A + hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of early severe rheumatoid arthritis.

机译:一项开放,随机的比较研究环孢菌素A,环孢菌素A +甲氨蝶呤和环孢菌素A +羟氯喹治疗早期严重风湿性关节炎。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: To determine whether a regimen of cyclosporine (CSA) and methotrexate (MTX), or CSA and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) introduced in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can produce a significant improvement in clinical outcome and/or retard radiographic damage in comparison with standard monotherapy with CSA alone. METHODS: One hundred five patients with active RA of less than 36 months duration, who had never previously been treated with immunosuppressive agents, were included in a 12-month, multi-center, open, randomized trial. Patients who fulfilled the criteria for early severe RA were randomized to receive either combination therapy (CSA + MTX n = 34, CSA + HCQ n = 35) or CSA alone (n = 36). RESULTS: CSA + MTX was more effective than the other two treatment groups in controlling RA symptoms. CSA+MTX did not show a significant radiographic progression according to Larsen-Dale (0.90 +/- 3.89 compared to baseline values, P > 0.05); moreover, patients treated with CSA alone or CSA+HCQ showed a significant worsening of Larsen-Dale score (2.91 +/- 5.99 and 2.97 +/- 4.28 respectively vs baseline values, P < 0.05), although not significant when compared with the CSA + HCQ group (P = 0.56 and 0.39, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This trial indicated that CSA+MTX was more effective than the other two treatments in improving clinical data and inhibiting radiographic progression, although the differences were not significant in this relatively small study. However, the difference was significant in favor of CSA + MTX regarding ACR 50% response.
机译:目的:与早期风湿性关节炎(RA)相比,确定环孢素(CSA)和甲氨蝶呤(MTX)或CSA和羟氯喹(HCQ)方案是否可以显着改善临床结果和/或延缓放射线照相损伤仅使用CSA的标准单一疗法。方法:一项为期12个月的多中心,开放,随机试验纳入了105名持续时间少于36个月的活动性RA患者,这些患者以前从未接受过免疫抑制剂的治疗。符合早期严重RA标准的患者被随机分配接受联合治疗(CSA + MTX n = 34,CSA + HCQ n = 35)或单独接受CSA(n = 36)。结果:CSA + MTX在控制RA症状方面比其他两个治疗组更有效。根据Larsen-Dale的研究,CSA + MTX的影像学检查无明显进展(与基线值相比,为0.90 +/- 3.89,P> 0.05);此外,单独接受CSA或CSA + HCQ治疗的患者相对于基线值,Larsen-Dale评分显着恶化(分别为2.91 +/- 5.99和2.97 +/- 4.28,P <0.05),尽管与CSA相比不显着+ HCQ组(分别为P = 0.56和0.39)。结论:该试验表明,CSA + MTX在改善临床数据和抑制放射学进展方面比其他两种治疗更有效,尽管在这项相对较小的研究中差异并不明显。但是,在ACR 50%响应方面,差异明显支持CSA + MTX。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号